haddock
Member
This is a question for the lith experts under you. I'm fairly new to lith printing and I've spend a significant number of nights in my darkroom to get some reasonable lith prints. However, I'm not happy with the results I have produced so far. I'm using:
- Meopta Opemus 6a with colour head (I'm happy with this enlarger)
- Fotospeed LD20 Lith Developer
Papers:
- Fotospeed Lith Paper
- Kentmere Kentona (Cd free emulsion!)
- Kentmere Document Art
- Ilford Multigrade FB Warmtone
- Agfa Multicontrast Classic MCC 111 FB
The developer concentration is 1A + 1B + 1(sodium) + 1(old brown) + 17water. Fresh stopper and fresh fixer all 20C degree.
So far I've only tested the Fotospeed and the Kentona paper. The Fotospeed paper seems to be quite difficult to manage. I'll need to do some more testing with this paper.
More important - and that's my question - is the behaviour of Kentmere Kentona. Tim Rudman seems to use this paper quite often with excellent results (as shown in his book). However, he also mentions the possible change in the emulsion for the Kentona paper - which seems to be the case for the new paper (now Cd free). I wonder if this is the reason why my prints have hardly any colour (only a slide yellowish cast) and the lith effect is hardly visible. The Fotospeed lith paper, however, produces extremely lithy results (which I haven't managed to control yet).
What are your lith experiences with the new Kentmere papers?
What can I do to produce a more pronounced lith effect?
How can I get the pink/magenta results with the new Kentona?
Which of the other papers I've listed above are good for lith printing?
What other papers do you recommend (must be available in the UK)?
I've read Tim's book forwards and backwards a few times. I'm certain I know the principles of lith printing (how to control contrast, hightlight details and so on). But some new input would be hugely appreciated.
Thanks for your help
Stephan (haddock)
- Meopta Opemus 6a with colour head (I'm happy with this enlarger)
- Fotospeed LD20 Lith Developer
Papers:
- Fotospeed Lith Paper
- Kentmere Kentona (Cd free emulsion!)
- Kentmere Document Art
- Ilford Multigrade FB Warmtone
- Agfa Multicontrast Classic MCC 111 FB
The developer concentration is 1A + 1B + 1(sodium) + 1(old brown) + 17water. Fresh stopper and fresh fixer all 20C degree.
So far I've only tested the Fotospeed and the Kentona paper. The Fotospeed paper seems to be quite difficult to manage. I'll need to do some more testing with this paper.
More important - and that's my question - is the behaviour of Kentmere Kentona. Tim Rudman seems to use this paper quite often with excellent results (as shown in his book). However, he also mentions the possible change in the emulsion for the Kentona paper - which seems to be the case for the new paper (now Cd free). I wonder if this is the reason why my prints have hardly any colour (only a slide yellowish cast) and the lith effect is hardly visible. The Fotospeed lith paper, however, produces extremely lithy results (which I haven't managed to control yet).
What are your lith experiences with the new Kentmere papers?
What can I do to produce a more pronounced lith effect?
How can I get the pink/magenta results with the new Kentona?
Which of the other papers I've listed above are good for lith printing?
What other papers do you recommend (must be available in the UK)?
I've read Tim's book forwards and backwards a few times. I'm certain I know the principles of lith printing (how to control contrast, hightlight details and so on). But some new input would be hugely appreciated.
Thanks for your help
Stephan (haddock)