Hmm, thanks for suggesting, will have to test it thenFomapan 400 also has some IR response.
Hmm, thanks for suggesting, will have to test it then
Not that deep in IR spectrum as the old one's, but best and only you can have today. Superpanchromatic (NIR) will give proper Wood effect with 715, 720nm filters. Might be risky to go above as sensitivity drops off at about 750nm with these films.Are these films really IR in the traditional sense?Red filter works with panchromatic films well too. Fun with films!
Not that deep in IR spectrum as the old one's, but best and only you can have today. Superpanchromatic (NIR) will give proper Wood effect with 715, 720nm filters. Might be risky to go above as sensitivity drops off at about 750nm with these films.
Are these any different from Ilford SFX? I haven't shot SFX for years, definitely dramatic. Thanks for this thread I need to try these films.
Well, that doesn't count to me. As far as I remember, it was earlier versions that were sensitive to some NIR, but today Foma website lists no sensitivity to speak of. But one might try it out with stupidly long exposure just in spite:Have to admit that I haven't tried it myself, but have seen some shots on-line.
I mentioned it (https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/fomapan-400-in-rodinal-1-50-ei-35mm.198140/post-2661700) that unfortunately Fomapan 400 lost its IR capabilities. The negatives were blank with the times I normally used it and even giving it significant more time did not help.Well, that doesn't count to me. As far as I remember, it was earlier versions that were sensitive to some NIR, but today Foma website lists no sensitivity to speak of. But one might try it out with stupidly long exposure just in spite:
Fomapan 400 Action:
View attachment 358415
SFX has weaker NIR response.
Hmm, interesting - will have to check out.Delta 3200 also shows a trace of infrared sensitivity
Yeah, the folks that get their films finished by Harmon/Foma/Shanghai, claim it’s a brand new emulsion, then get pissy when folks call them out (you know who you are) really annoy me. Just tell us it’s Aviphot, we already know but it makes you look so much less like a shady person when you just admit it.It is indeed so.
And the given list already includes majority of Aviphot reworks/repackages.
Adox
Takes Aviphot 80, puts some work in it, and boosts pictorial ISO 1 stop, making a great ISO 50 film. Then selling it as HR-50 and Scala 50 for affordable price. I have no problems with this and congratulations for making sweet tech emulsion available for regular shooters.
Meanwhile everyone else on the list (except Ilford and Foma), probably Astrum included, just plain:
- Repackages either Aviphot 80 or 200;
- put their half or fully assed logos on it;
- without putting any additional work into it;
- often charging way higher prices than Adox;
- far too often lying that it's a "completely new emulsion, made for them" and I have some problems with this, but like that tech emulsion is available... I just avoid these resellers whenever possible.
This horse has already been beaten to death more than once, but more info on this practice here: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...-films-and-kentmere-100-and-400-films.196304/
Currently the IR response goes as this, starting with less sensitive: Fomapan R 100 < Ilford SFX 200 < Aviphot derivatives.
If you need Aviphot 200, cheapest iteration usually is Rollei Superpan 200 in bulk, but most expensive - Infrared 400. If Astrum turns out doing the same, then cheapest option would be to buy bulk from Ukraine.
Cute.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?