Linen Paper for Iron-based Processes

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 0
  • 0
  • 52
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 119
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 124
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 8
  • 298

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,748
Messages
2,780,310
Members
99,693
Latest member
lachanalia
Recent bookmarks
0

Mike Ware

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
47
Location
Buxton, Derbyshire, UK
Format
Medium Format
A New Linen Paper for Siderotype (Iron-based) Processes

As fellow-practitioners of the "ferric processes" will know only too well, the last technical difficulty confronting us is the uncertain quality and composition of the paper stock that we coat.
Everything else lies within our control.
In recent times, I've heard that the commercial supplies of cotton furnishings for high quality papermaking have become increasingly unreliable, sometimes causing problems in the changing characteristics and supply of some of our most popular papers for hand-coating, such as Arches Platine and Bergger COT 320.

For nearly 20 years I've successfully used a 100% cotton handmade paper called 'Buxton' paper, from Ruscombe Mill at Margaux, the background is here:

MikeWare - Paper for Alternative Printing

Recently I've been testing a new paper from Ruscombe Mill, which will become fully available by the end of April, this year. The launch of this product has been announced on the Mill's website:

RUSCOMBE HANDMADE PAPERS, on-line sales

It will differ from all other alternative process papers in being handmade from 100% linen cellulose fibre (i.e. made entirely from the best quality flax, not cotton).
Chris Bingham, the master papermaker at Ruscombe Mill, is making this product for the alternative process community, and has named it 'Herschel' paper, remembering that great man's innovation of the siderotype processes. He sees it as the future replacement for Buxton and Talbot papers.

I've tested Herschel paper with argyrotype, new cyanotype, palladiotype, platinotype, platino-palladiotype, and new chrysotype. It performs superbly with all these processes as I practice them.

I guess that the different performance of flax versus cotton cellulose lies in the fibre morphology constraining the image substance. The structure of the flax fibre may enhance its ability to retain nanoparticles of image pigment, which is essential to the success of all siderotype processes. During the wet processing, I don't see any "bleeding" of image substance - even Prussian blue, which is notorious. I've been particularly delighted with the colour of the silver images it yields with my argyrotype process, and the range of colours obtainable with new chrysotype, which are also highly dependent on particle size.

Herschel paper, like Buxton, is 'engine-sized' with neutral alkylketene dimer, AKD. It can be rod-coated with sensitizer solution similarly to Buxton, with the addition of Tween 20 surfactant to the sensitizer, to ca. 0.1-0.2%. There is, of course, absolutely no added chalk or other alkaline buffer in this paper, which seriously inhibit siderotype, no surface sizing such as gelatin, which 'kills' platinum, nor clay or gypsum fillers, OBAs, etc., etc. With all processes, the Dmax is high, the cold-pressed surface is perfectly matte with a 'fine tooth' texture, the clearing of whites in the wet processing is rapid and complete, and the gradation and smoothness of the image tones are excellent. This linen paper sheet has much greater resilience and wet strength than cotton papers, notwithstanding its moderate weight of 200 gsm. Dimensional stability is good, with about 1% hydroexpansivity; but to obtain a perfectly flat sheet after processing, it does need to be dried slowly under pressure.

'Herschel' paper will prove an excellent replacement for Buxton, with the advantage that the Mill's supply of linen cellulose fibre (from flax grown in Northern France or Belgium) is more reliable and consistent than present supplies of cotton. In high quality papermaking, confidence in the raw materials is paramount. One need have little worry about archivality, because linen was the first plant fibre historically available to Europeans for making fabrics. Long before the growth of the cotton textile industry towards the end of the 18th Century, linen rags were being processed in the 15th Century for European papermaking, and such papers have endured well to this day. I believe that linen has also been used for banknotes, bonds, and other security papers.

I apologise if you encounter multiple postings of this information, (and I beg the usual critics kindly to note that I have no commercial or pecuniary interest in this product.)

With good wishes to all,

Mike

Dr Mike Ware
mike@mikeware.co.uk
MikeWare - Welcome
 

Colin Graham

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
1,264
Format
Plastic Cameras
Great news. It seems like the dimensional stability would make it a good paper to use for multiple hit printing. Looking forward to trying it.
 

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,147
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
- I wonder about the choices of 200 gsm and cold- instead of hot-pressed?
- How white is the paper as compared to, say, Platine?
- Will the paper be available in the US?
 

Colin Graham

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
1,264
Format
Plastic Cameras
- I wonder about the choices of 200 gsm and cold- instead of hot-pressed?

I missed that on the first read, that is an interesting decision to have a cold pressed finish only. Expensive I can deal with but cold pressed leaves me...well, cold.

But maybe linen papers doesn't require the calendaring that cotton linters papers do for a finer surface?
 

Loris Medici

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
1,154
Location
Istanbul, Tu
Format
Multi Format
I think (w.a. guess) the reason of the - relatively - low weight is because of the fact that the paper is primarily targeted to siderotype (cyanotype, argyrotype/vandyke/kallitype, pt/pd) practitioners; medium weight is more practical; washing / clearing is quicker and more effective + IME & somehow, medium / low weight papers give better dmax. (I can't explain why, though!)

The reason of NOT surface: Again, w.a. guess, to increase retention of image forming colloidal prussian blue / silver / noble metal particles, and/or facilitate clearing due the "more open" surface.

BTW, the texture of the few sheets of Buxton I've seen wasn't pronounced at all - even at 8x10" image size, it was a subtle and random / natural texture...

Regards,
Loris.
 
OP
OP

Mike Ware

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
47
Location
Buxton, Derbyshire, UK
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for all comments on this new paper option - a response to specific points:

Regarding surface:-

Cold- or hot-pressed is an issue of taste, of course, and actual image size, i.e. viewing distance. Herschel suits my current printing at 11"x16", but I'm still happy with the texture at 8"x10"; at 4"x5" it might become a little obtrusive.
Many hot-pressed papers, like Arches Platine, lose some of their calender in the wet processing, especially on the felt side.
Processed Herschel paper does not look much different, compared with processed Arches Platine - just a hint warmer white, perhaps, and a little more 'tooth'.
To provide an impression, I'll risk an attachment of some steptablets - although the scanner optics have rather overemphasised the surface texture.

Regarding performance:-

Herschel paper's most important advantage over Arches Platine, COT 320, or Weston Diploma is that it displays no spots - black or white.
Its difference to most machine-made papers is that it requires absolutely no preliminary treatments of any kind before coating with iron-based sensitizer solutions.
That appeals to a lazy operator like me.

Its absorbancy is economic (~30 cc of sensitizer per square meter, dependent on ambient RH) but gives sufficient coating weight for a good Dmax.
The 200 gsm weight provides quite adequate strength for handling wet-processed 16"x20" sheets - I've not tried a full Imperial sheet, but have no doubt that it would be strong enough.
A weight heavier than 200 gsm in linen might cause drying problems.

Regarding expense:-

When printing in precious metals, failure with a cheap paper will cost far more than success with an expensive one.
False economy in choice of paper can make one a favorite customer of the Pt/Pd/Au chemicals suppliers.

As a rough estimate: a skilled papermaker can probably hand-make 10 sheets of paper in about the same time that it takes one of us to hand-make one siderotype print on it.
At what sum do we value our handmade prints? So should we be prepared to pay as much as 1/10th of that for the sheet of fine handmade paper?

Mike
 

Attachments

  • Siderotypes on Herschel paper.jpg
    Siderotypes on Herschel paper.jpg
    211.8 KB · Views: 201

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,147
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
Your points are well taken. The midtones look a bit grainy in the step tablet images, but that could just be the scan. I am always game to try a new paper, but still don't know if it will available in the US ...

Thanks for all comments on this new paper option - a response to specific points:

Regarding surface:-

Cold- or hot-pressed is an issue of taste, of course, and actual image size, i.e. viewing distance. Herschel suits my current printing at 11"x16", but I'm still happy with the texture at 8"x10"; at 4"x5" it might become a little obtrusive.
Many hot-pressed papers, like Arches Platine, lose some of their calender in the wet processing, especially on the felt side.
Processed Herschel paper does not look much different, compared with processed Arches Platine - just a hint warmer white, perhaps, and a little more 'tooth'.
To provide an impression, I'll risk an attachment of some steptablets - although the scanner optics have rather overemphasised the surface texture.

Regarding performance:-

Herschel paper's most important advantage over Arches Platine, COT 320, or Weston Diploma is that it displays no spots - black or white.
Its difference to most machine-made papers is that it requires absolutely no preliminary treatments of any kind before coating with iron-based sensitizer solutions.
That appeals to a lazy operator like me.

Its absorbancy is economic (~30 cc of sensitizer per square meter, dependent on ambient RH) but gives sufficient coating weight for a good Dmax.
The 200 gsm weight provides quite adequate strength for handling wet-processed 16"x20" sheets - I've not tried a full Imperial sheet, but have no doubt that it would be strong enough.
A weight heavier than 200 gsm in linen might cause drying problems.

Regarding expense:-

When printing in precious metals, failure with a cheap paper will cost far more than success with an expensive one.
False economy in choice of paper can make one a favorite customer of the Pt/Pd/Au chemicals suppliers.

As a rough estimate: a skilled papermaker can probably hand-make 10 sheets of paper in about the same time that it takes one of us to hand-make one siderotype print on it.
At what sum do we value our handmade prints? So should we be prepared to pay as much as 1/10th of that for the sheet of fine handmade paper?

Mike
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom