• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Light Yellow Filter

I tend to leave the yellow filter on the cameras with black & white film all the time. If there is no sky and clouds in the sky, the filter does not make enough difference to cause me to remove the filter, much like keeping a UV or Skylight filter on a lens for color slides or negatives.
 
Filters don't have sharp transitions from one color to the other so there is always a broad range of colors affected by one filter. Take a look at actual curves and you will see what I mean. So you can talk about color theory and subtle effects on skin tones, but in practice the results are much fuzzier than suggested by that.
 
I have the publication you refer to. The Kodak technical publications were excellent!
 
Anything bluish will be depressed about a stop, and anything warmish lightened up. Get a broad range of paint color chips and photograph them together with and without your yellow filter. You'll get the idea. It certainly isn't inert, and affects everything in the scene, not just the sky. But only you can decide if you like the results
or not.
 


This is a really important point. The effect on the shadows was a surprise to me and it took a really long time for me to figure out that the yellow filter was making the shadows darker....sometimes, much darker.
 
leaving a light yellow on for good is not a bad idea; it's also said to render images more like we see them and eliminate a wavelength sensitivity bias of regular B&W film. I agree; try it for a roll and see if you like it but how are you going to deal with different lenses?
 
Not sure if i completely understand your question, but.....i am dealing with a 35mm SLR.
Most of the lens are similar size, and i do have Yellow for a few sizes.....49, 52, 55
 
This is a really important point. The effect on the shadows was a surprise to me and it took a really long time for me to figure out that the yellow filter was making the shadows darker....sometimes, much darker.
that's true and can be overly strong with some types od trees such as pine.
 
The Impressionists sure stirred up controversy when they painted shadows blue - but that's what they are under blue sky, and one of the uses for contrast filters is to accentuate textures, because these contain blue details. It's not always about the sky itself.
 
I think i am a Non-Filter guy...but to be honest, i did not have a #6, just a #8.
I am thinking the #6 would have had less effect.?
I basically shot Two Rolls of 36 frames. The first 28 were with just a Haze Filter. The remaining 44 frames were with the #8 filter (no haze filter).
I think, over-all, for most of the pictures and especially in the shadows areas as mentioned by some of the members.....i like the look with no filter.
I think For Me, doing "Street Photography" in Decent/Strong sunlight, i will be best served by a UV Filter, and a Lens Hood with the tightest snoot that the lens will allow, before it starts to show any kind of vignetting.
Thanks For All The Replys
 
The Great Yellow Father in Rochester, in the past, told us that a yellow filter (like a Written K2) was needed to give the "correct monochromatic rendition" of a scene using their panchromatic B&W films. Kodak AND Tiffen . Do you think they know/knew something?................Regards to all!
 
From the Kodak datasheet for T-Max 400:
"* The blue sensitivity of KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX Films is slightly less than that of other Kodak panchromatic black-and-white films. This enables the response of this film to be closer to the response of the human eye. Therefore, blues may be recorded as slightly darker tones with this film—a more natural rendition."
 
It seems Kodak & Tiffen know different things.
 
It is a valid question. Skin tones will obey the same rules as anything else. Take a look at the Yusuf Kharsh (sp?) portrait of Hemingway for instance, those tones were from orthochromatic film but the same can be done with filters.

I remember seeing a story about an early 20th century local NY photographer in an Italian neighborhood who used a red filter on all his child portraits to lighten their skin. He made a pile of money because it made the kids look "American".