Light Recommendation: 30x40 Vacuum Easel

WWPPD2025-01-scaled.jpg

A
WWPPD2025-01-scaled.jpg

  • 2
  • 1
  • 43
Shannon Falls.jpg

D
Shannon Falls.jpg

  • 3
  • 0
  • 84
Trail

Trail

  • 1
  • 0
  • 96
IMG_6621.jpeg

A
IMG_6621.jpeg

  • 1
  • 2
  • 176
Carved bench

A
Carved bench

  • 1
  • 3
  • 200

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,078
Messages
2,769,348
Members
99,559
Latest member
Evraissio
Recent bookmarks
0

Peter York

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Messages
2
Format
4x5 Format
Hi all,

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post - please forgive me if this belongs elsewhere on the forum.

I was fortunate to come across a NuArc 30x40 vacuum easel in perfect working order. Now comes the "fun" part of building some sort of light source for alternative process printing. I have read numerous posts about lighting here and elsewhere, including Sandy King's article at unblinkingeye, but I am looking for some feedback on 2 options I am considering:

1. Right now, the unit is sitting next to a large, south-facing window (about 41" wide x 46" high) and my budget plan is to build a large box out of foam board, with polished aluminium on the inside, to rest on the unit, make contact with the window and capture sunlight. I'm concerned, though, about adequate/even illumination as well as repeatable results (important cost-wise when I eventually print large), and I'm wondering if you think this route might work or not? I live in Denver, which does have many days of clear, sunny skies.

2. Otherwise, I'm thinking that 1 or 2 1000w HID lamps is probably preferable and more economical than a bank of flourescent tubes, though I have not spec'd this out yet.

Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks!

Peter
 

piticu

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
101
Location
Slobozia, Ro
Format
4x5 Format
you call 2x1000w economical? am i missing something here? 10 tubes will consume around 150-200w :unsure:
 

Loris Medici

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
1,154
Location
Istanbul, Tu
Format
Multi Format
piticu, 13x 48" 40W UVBL tubes (OP will have to cover 30x40" remember?) + 13x electronic ballasts + fixing* + cabling* will take quite a lot of money. OTOH, 2x 1000W HID lamps + fixtures can be obtained for something like USD 300-400...

(*) Something that has to be outsourced if you aren't competent in carpentry and electric circuitry...

Therefore it seems like a trade-off between high initial costs / low running costs and low initial costs / high running costs...

Regards,
Loris.
 

piticu

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
101
Location
Slobozia, Ro
Format
4x5 Format
i wasn't thinking at all about initial costs but running costs :smile: thanks for opeing my eyes. again.
 
OP
OP

Peter York

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Messages
2
Format
4x5 Format
Thanks for the replies. Yes, I do have some calculating to do w.r.t. setup and running costs.

Any feedback on the sunlight option? I'll probably give it a whirl just to see if it works but I'm wondering if anyone has experience with capturing sunlight through a window. Someone on another forum expressed doubt about using reflective surfaces because it might create hotspots w.r.t. even illumination.

Peter
 

LincolnF

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
2
Format
35mm
The most significant problem with sunlight is it's variability due to season, latitude, time of day, cloud cover and humidity absorption. With a vacuum frame you wont have the luxury of checking for exposure as with a spring back frame. With alternate processes there is enough variability to drive one crazy without adding the uncertainty of exposure.
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
The most significant problem with sunlight is it's variability due to season, latitude, time of day, cloud cover and humidity absorption. With a vacuum frame you wont have the luxury of checking for exposure as with a spring back frame. With alternate processes there is enough variability to drive one crazy without adding the uncertainty of exposure.

Printing by inspection is definitely "old school".

I don't see that it has much advantage if one is careful with their craft. As a matter of fact I've never indulged in the practice.

Don Bryant
 

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
Printing by inspection is definitely "old school".

I don't see that it has much advantage if one is careful with their craft. As a matter of fact I've never indulged in the practice.

Don Bryant
I agree. Even when I print POP I use a predetermined base exposure and tweak after inspecting test prints.
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
I was fortunate to come across a NuArc 30x40 vacuum easel in perfect working order. Now comes the "fun" part of building some sort of light source for alternative process printing. I have read numerous posts about lighting here and elsewhere, including Sandy King's article at unblinkingeye, but I am looking for some feedback on 2 options I am considering:


Peter

Just for the record I have a 35"X45" NuaArc vacuum frame. I decided to use it with a bank of twelve (12) 48" BL tubes. Produces a total of 480 watts and with a fan in the side stays very cool.

Now if you could put it outside with a light integrator I think you would be very pleased.

Sandy King
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom