Lighten up, Rob. Your posts indicate you have a chip on your shoulder.
I have... ONE... HUNDRED... BILLION... DOLLARS. So I'm going to buy a Bugatti Veyron because I can afford it and want one. You can criticize me all you want... but you have no chance against me on the track... unless you're much better than me... easily done though.
You're fantasizing
Aren't I though... 'tis true, 'tis true... just as it is with you, sir.
To presume we know the motives of another person with minimal input... why golly-gee... ain't that fantasizing?
We'll see won't we. Or then again maybe we won't.
I don't need to, you've already done it for me.
One of the joy of working with LF is the ground glass. I can look at them all dayI shoot a lot of 4x5 and 6x17. Used to have handheld cameras including the Goersi 4x5PS and the fabled Chamonix Saber, but in the end, ground glass rules...
That's one of the reasons that I love 8x10, the huge ground glass.
That's a real nice shot, Richard.
I agree with others who suggest the biggest reason to jump from 6x7cm to 4x5in is for full camera movements. If you were jumping from 6x4.5cm to 4x5 that is a greater 'quality' difference when making large prints.
I've been reading and I don't understand the use of 'movements' on LF cameras. Why is that useful? Thanks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?