I have the 80, 135, and the 250. All are great, I think the 135 is a Tessar and it's very sharp. The 250 is a nice lens, but it's a bit unwieldy. It looks almost bigger than the body, but it's great when you really need a long lens. This one was shot handheld with the 250mm.
I've never owned a 250mm lens pair because it makes the camera too front heavy which makes the camera too cumbersome for convenient hand holding and doesn't cock automatically when winding the film it has to be done manualy, so I bought the 180mm Super lens instead and found it more suitable for my purposes.
I have been shooting with a C330f for over 20 years, with 80, 55 and 135 and I give my hearty vote to the 135. Light for its class, sharp, great bokeh.
I have been shooting with a C330f for over 20 years, with 80, 55 and 135 and I give my hearty vote to the 135. Light for its class, sharp, great bokeh.
And Hasselblad CF lenses almost all use the same size lenses. The lens hoods are the same diameter and attachment, however different focal length lenses require different hoods for the proper field of view.
From your post Mamiya products must be inferior because the 55mm lens and the 250mm lens use the same lens hood.
And Hasselblad CF lenses almost all use the same size lenses. The lens hoods are the same diameter and attachment, however different focal length lenses require different hoods for the proper field of view.
From your post Mamiya products must be inferior because the 55mm lens and the 250mm lens use the same lens hood.