lens/format for dummies

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 5
  • 3
  • 40
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 1
  • 45
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 5
  • 0
  • 77
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 100
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 70

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,839
Messages
2,781,675
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0

haris

Hello,

Yes I have read largeformatphotograhy.info site and some other resources, and still am confused in few things. And they are:

1. How to determine which focal lenght for what format? That is how to decide/calculate focal lenght of lens I need to have all movement of camera (including scheimpflug) and avoid vignetting?

2. How to determine/calculate ratio between bellows lenght/focal lenght of lens, that is to be able to focus lens from closest focus to infinity what bellows lenght I need?

3. How to determine wide lenses needed, and do I need long or telephoto lenses if I go to longer than normal lenses.

Basically, how to calculate what lens I need for particular camera format at same time keeping movement of camera, focusing through all focus range, and to have whole image and not cropped image or vignetting?

Next thing is reading lens charts. For example Schneider have lens info with telling "this lens is suitable for this format" and Rodenstock have lens charts which tells "this lens using with this format has tilt horizontal x vertical Y". How to read those charts, that is what shift in that situation means.

If answer will be too long, please, source of informations would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,263
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
You seem to think it is so complicated :D

It isn't but you need to realise that for any given format most manufacturers make a range of lenses that will give adequate movements.

So for 5x4 it's roughly:

90mm Super Angulon/Grandagon = 28mm on 35mm format
150mm Symmar/Sironar = 50mm on 35mm format
210mm Symmar/Sironar = 75mm on 35mm format.

10x8 rough equivalents are:

165mm Super Angulon = 28mm on 35mm format
300mm Symmar etc = 50mm on 35mm format.

You very quickly learn which lenses cover what.

Ian
 
OP
OP

haris

Thank you Ian,

Yes it seems very complicated for now, but I will learn :smile:
 

david b

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
4,026
Location
None of your
Format
Medium Format
Will this chart help?

I think I got it somewhere on the LF forum.
 

Attachments

  • focalchart.gif
    focalchart.gif
    181.1 KB · Views: 184

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
It's simple really. The "normal" lens is defined as approximately the diagonal of the film format, and the needed minimum coverage is exactly the diagonal of the film format. Any more coverage than that will allow for movements.

With the camera focussed at infinity, the bellows length needed will in most cases be very, very close to the focal length. focussing closer will give more coverage, since the "cone of light" behind the lens gets wider as you move the lens away from the film to focus closer. The "extension formula" is 1/F = 1/u + 1/v, where F is focal length, u is distance from film to lens, and v is distance from lens to subject. There are a couple of caveats to this formula, since you really have to take into account things like internodal distance. But except for telephoto lenses, it's close enough.

Lens charts give how much rise/fall and lateral shift you can use with a given lens on a given film format without getting fuzzy corners from the corners of the film poking outside the edge of good coverage. That's fairly simple geometry.

Now e.g. a 13x18cm or 5x7" film has an image diagonal which is just about 210mm. So the "normal lens" for this format is a 210mm. But since not all 210mm lenses are equal, they can have very different coverage: A 210mm telephoto lens might cover only 24x36mm, a Tessar-type about 220mm, a Plasmat 300mm, and a wide-angle (like a Super-Angulon) 500mm. So a Tessar (like a Xenar f:4.5) will cover with very little movements, a Plasmat (Symmar) will cover with lots of movements, and a Super-Angulon is way overkill - very few cameras can take the treatment needed to get even close to the edge of the image circle.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,263
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Haris, I think the difficult part is realising which lenses fit into the different groups and categories. The lenses I mention give you something to compare others to.

It's worth trying to meet up with an LF user, and see just how the lenses behave and how much movement you really need to use.

Ian
 
OP
OP

haris

Thank you david and Ole. David, I have that comparasion shart, but it isn't that :smile:

I guess diagonal are calculated by Pythagora's theoreme, square of hypotenuse is equal as sum of squares of cathetes, right?
 
OP
OP

haris

It's worth trying to meet up with an LF user, and see just how the lenses behave and how much movement you really need to use.

Ian

Yes, but here are no LF user, in fact here are no film users anymore, atleast I don't know any :smile:
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
I guess diagonal are calculated by Pythagora's theoreme, square of hypotenuse is equal as sum of squares of cathetes, right?

Right. Just remember that in LF, image format is a little bit smaller than film format, which again is a little bit smaller than the "name of the format". So that the image area of "13x18cm" film is about 12cm x 17cm...
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
Haris first of all it's simpler and more complicated then they say -)

Start with a "normal" lens. A normal lens is roughly the diagonal.

A wide lens is shorter.

A long lens is then longer.

Sounds simple? But the same lens on different format cameras can change from wide to normal to long. Say a "normal" 5x7 lens that covers 8x10. It's long for 4x5. Normal for 5x7. Wide for 8x10.

Which type to use? It's no different then smaller cameras. When would you use a wide/long lens for MF?


If you're doing landscape you don't need masses of coverage normally. But the question on how much is it depends.
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Haris, try to think in terms of field of view rather than focal length and all will be well :wink:

Look up any LF lens on, say, the b&h site, and you will see a field of view or angular coverage or "covering power" stated for the largest piece of film that the lens covers. Armed with that information, you can see very quickly how wide or long the lens is.

Here's a simple angle tip: if you extend your arm and hold up a finger, the width of that finger is approximately 2 degrees. So a hand width is about 10 degrees. That's all ya need- frame your scene with your hands and you'll know which lens to reach for :wink:

Here's how I would describe some common LF lenses that I use for 4x5 and other formats:

55mm : nutty wide, really fun and challenging to use
65: plenty wide for most indoor stuff;
90: wide enough for most landscape stuff- a popular focal length for first forays into semiwide stuff;
120: wide-normal (good for macro);
150: normal, kinda blah, but versatile travel length;
210: still kinda normal, a bit long, the lens almost everyone has for 4x5;
360: feels like my favourite semi-tight portrait length in 35mm- just long enough for flattering ear/nose ratio
600: getting pretty long, nice for compressed landscapes
720: about as long as I care to go with LF, albeit still only moderate tele by 35mm standards; good for standoff macro (here's a recent 8x10 test polaroid with my 720), see it's not so long after all.

For 5x7 you can just move my comments down one row, for 8x10, one row further :wink: Fo exmaple, I think 720 is nice for 8x10 macro, and may also be nice for tight portrait (haven't tried yet, just got it)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP

haris

Thank you Nick and Keith.

Interesting stuff this LF photography :smile:
 
OP
OP

haris

Yes Dan, I have. I read it again and with explanation I got here it is clearer.

And this reminds me of another question. Reading this part from Ole's answer:

...But since not all 210mm lenses are equal, they can have very different coverage: A 210mm telephoto lens might cover only 24x36mm, a Tessar-type about 220mm, a Plasmat 300mm, and a wide-angle (like a Super-Angulon) 500mm. So a Tessar (like a Xenar f:4.5) will cover with very little movements, a Plasmat (Symmar) will cover with lots of movements, and a Super-Angulon is way overkill - very few cameras can take the treatment needed to get even close to the edge of the image circle.

my question is how one can recognise if lens is Tessar or Plasmat or... type of lens. By some "code" "hidden" in name of lens, or technical details of lens need to be found and read.


Thank you all again and enjoy life...
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,823
Format
Multi Format
haris wrote "my question is how one can recognise if lens is Tessar or Plasmat or... type of lens. By some "code" "hidden" in name of lens, or technical details of lens need to be found and read."

Well, you have to know. If you don't know, you have to learn. I hesitate to suggest a book such as Cox' Photographic Optics or Kingslake's A History of the Photographic Lens because both are considerably out-of-date. On the other hand, with the exception of the new high coverage wonder lenses from Schneider (see www.schneideroptics.com and www.schneiderkreuznach.com, look around on both sites) and Rodenstock (http://www.linos.com/pages/home/shop-optik/rodenstock-foto-objektive/analoge-fachfotografie) there hasn't been much new in LF lenses for quite a while.

I've found A Lens Collector's Vade Mecum very helpful for understanding what older lenses are even though, as Ole and I both often say, it is riddled with errors.

But if you want to start from, um, theory and reason your way to practice you're in trouble. This because not all designs in the same family, e.g., double Gauss, whatever that means, cover the same angles. There are huge lists of lenses with coverage around, many of the assembled by Michael Gudzinowicz. Google will find them for you.

haris, for what its worth I think that those of us who make large fusses about lenses designs are somewhat closet Marxists. We worry more about inputs than outputs. In my limited experience, most of the lenses that have been offered for LF cameras all work quite well. The big differences are in coverage, and there everyone gets a bit mystical. Some insist that, for example, dagor types have huge coverage, others deny it vigorously. And there are major disagreements about how much coverage is enough. The one thing that everyone agrees on is that a tessar whose focal length is normal for the format it is used on won't allow much shift/rise. Otherwise you pays your money and you takes your chances.
 
OP
OP

haris

Thank you Dan.

About "closet Marxists". It is not uncommon that people like to show off with their knowledge, and because of that they go into too much theory, calculation, science, and practice is somewhere in corner. You know what is to someone a hobby or love to someone other is religion :smile:. It is great if someone is interested in lens design and like, but if one only want to go and to make/take photographs, then... :smile: Well, it is price to pay for learning, so it is OK :smile: And as they say it never hurts to know a little more :smile:

And, now, my mouths are hurting for this much smiles :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

Regards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
Check the google groups archive of rec.photo.largeformat [something like that]

Check the threads here,the Largeformat website and even photo.net

Most modern lenses types are similar designs. Plamats are most of the fast expensive studio lenses. The smaller hiking lenses are often Tessars. Then you've got things like the Fuji compact lenses [Dialyate??] There are exceptions to what I've said but for modern lenses it's easy to find the info with a quick google.

Old lenses are the hard ones.
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
There are no simple fixes. What happens if you're interested and pay attention is that you will learn all of the classic "types" and roughly what that covers. So when I'm cruising ebay and I see some old brass lens I will recognize from the clues and be right 90% of the time. For instance I'll see an 11" f8 lens and know that since it's in a certain age group and it's f8 that it is probably a Rapid Rectilinear and I know that most common f8 RR's will cover about 60 degrees and at 60 degrees it will be sort of tight on 8X10 but was probably sold for the full plate crowd. Some clues: f4.5 lenses are almost always either better quality tessar types or they are dialyt types. Dialyts are good for 55 degrees or so. Tessars usually 60. I'll also consider how many air glass interfaces also from type. As the number goes up the contrast goes down. f5.6 lenses are usually modern-ish plasmats. 72 degrees coverage is a good rule for them. F6.8 is sometimes a dagor type but also some of them are dialyts. More learning involved. If it's a dagor it will usually cover about 82 degrees. Older wide field lenses will usually tell you so. You just have to learn what they are. It takes time. And a lot of wasted $$ trying things out. Wide field lenses are usually 82 to about 90 degree coverage. Dagors. Wide field Ektar's. Cheaper f6.8 WA Raptar's. Angulons. These all fall into the wide field category. Then there are true wide angle lenses like Super Angulon's etc. These are usually 105 degrees if they are modern at all. Some of the old Protar V lenses cover 110 degrees.

On a piece of graph paper you can sketch the diagonal of the different formats and see what angle is needed to go beyond it for the different focal lengths. A good rule if you like movements is to go one size bigger in coverage. So a lens that will cover 210mm or the diagonal for 5X7 will allow nice movements on a 4X5...and so on.

That's just a scratch on the surface. Like all things worth learning, there is time and effort necessary. There are no instant easy quick fixes. Dive in and start learning.

One important rule I forgot to mention. Don't believe anything the ebay sellers are telling you. Ask here if you're not sure about an f4.5 Tominon that some smuck says is a wide angle that covers 5X7. We'll tell you NO it isn't, it's a very nice tessar that will cover 6X7 cm with movements, 1/4 plate, barely. And so it goes.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2006
Messages
858
Format
Multi Format
Hello,

Yes I have read largeformatphotograhy.info site and some other resources, and still am confused in few things. And they are:

1. How to determine which focal lenght for what format? That is how to decide/calculate focal lenght of lens I need to have all movement of camera (including scheimpflug) and avoid vignetting?

Others have mentioned some common lenses for 4x5 or 8x10. A very general rule is that if you use a lens that would work for 8x10 on a smaller 4x5 camera, then you should never run out of coverage. However, there are some 4x5 cameras that allow more movement than lenses will cover. There are also older press style cameras (Crown Graphic, Speed Graphic, et al) that have very limited movements.

The other vignetting possible is from the bellows of the camera. This is something you can see on the ground glass while focusing. Most of the time you might find that you do not use much movements, so this is rarely a problem. If you shoot at largest aperture, or use really extreme movements, then sometimes you can run into a vignetting problem with almost any lens.

2. How to determine/calculate ratio between bellows lenght/focal lenght of lens, that is to be able to focus lens from closest focus to infinity what bellows lenght I need?

I don't know if someone mentioned it yet, but a good general rule to get a bellows length twice as long as your most used lens. What you really should figure out is how close you want to focus. If you want to do many shots really close, then obviously a camera with longer bellows will help. So it depends a little on what types of photographs you want to do; landscapes or architecture shots might not need much of any close focus ability, but people shots, or images of insects, flowers, watches, or small objects, might mean more bellows extension is needed. It really depends what you want to photograph.

3. How to determine wide lenses needed, and do I need long or telephoto lenses if I go to longer than normal lenses.


Wide angle lenses are really tough to use when you are starting with large format. The ground glass on the back of the camera will be much dimmer than with a more normal or longer lens, which makes focus and composition very tough. When starting out, I would suggest you not get a wide angle lens; wait until you have been shooting for a little while.

A telephoto lens is a different matter. Basically, you want to give yourself more distance between your subject and the camera, or you simply cannot get any closer to what you want to photograph (too far away). A telephoto lens needs less bellows length for the same focus than a regular long lens design. In large format lenses, do not assume a larger focal length is a telephoto design; these lenses will be indicated as telephoto only if they are constructed differently.


Basically, how to calculate what lens I need for particular camera format at same time keeping movement of camera, focusing through all focus range, and to have whole image and not cropped image or vignetting?

Next thing is reading lens charts. For example Schneider have lens info with telling "this lens is suitable for this format" and Rodenstock have lens charts which tells "this lens using with this format has tilt horizontal x vertical Y". How to read those charts, that is what shift in that situation means.

If answer will be too long, please, source of informations would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Shift is the front displacement/movement of the lens holder board away from the centre. A few cameras also allow shift on the rear standard, which holds the film holder and ground glass. Shift means left or right. Rise means up, and fall means down, though basically same limit as shift in the lens data.

Swing means rotation clockwise or anti-clockwise away from the lens centre, and can be called tilt horizontal. Again, this movement can be duplicated on the rear standard of some cameras. To get a rotation upwards or downwards would be tilt vertical, something that you might see in camera specifications. Some cameras also allow tilt on the rear standard too.

When you read lens specifications, sometimes the companies list how much displacement/movement on different sizes of film for the same lens. The other thing to pay attention to is that most of the specifications are when the aperture on the lens is set to f22.0 and that if you use the lens closer to f5.6 or f8.0 (or whatever maximum aperture is possible), then you get less room for movements.

Really general example of all this is that many more modern 180mm and 210 mm f5.6 lenses in Copal shutters give more than enough room for movements on 4x5. With one of these, you would rarely ever have to worry about vignetting. While there are lenses shorter focal length than these with lots of coverage, they tend to cost much more in the modern varieties.

You have some advise here about old lenses. Just be really careful before you get something really old to learn about large format photography. Old shutters can have trouble working, or need service. Old glass can be fogged, and need cleaning. Unless you want to deal with that on your own, it can cost you more to get some old lenses because you must add the cost of cleaning them, or the cost of fixing/adjusting a shutter. Despite really good advise here about old types of lenses, I suggest getting something more modern like a Nikon/Nikkor, Schneider, or Rodenstock in a Copal shutter.

I suggest starting with one lens, like a 135mm, 150mm, 180mm or 210mm and a 4x5 camera. Use that one lens for a while, until you are comfortable with it. Then you will have a better idea of getting a longer or shorter lens, or you might even find that you are okay with just one lens. Usually you can sell almost any modern lens or slightly modern camera for about what you payed for it, so if you do not like something, just sell and use the money to get something else. Best of luck to you.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat Photography
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,823
Format
Multi Format
Jim, in my limited experience f/6.3 tessars have been better than f/4.5s.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom