Leica regret?

Jared and Rick at Moot

A
Jared and Rick at Moot

  • 1
  • 0
  • 332
Leaf in Creek

Leaf in Creek

  • 0
  • 0
  • 347
Leaf in Creek

A
Leaf in Creek

  • 5
  • 0
  • 766
Untitled

Untitled

  • 2
  • 2
  • 868

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,946
Messages
2,799,277
Members
100,084
Latest member
Marshal!
Recent bookmarks
0

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format
Agree. Too bad about the squinty finders though...

Proportionally correct for the Barnacks form factor and the majority of other brands as well - such VF/RF sizes were traditional back then. Past 1950's people got used to larger ones.

There was a reason so many famous photographers put a viewfinder on their rangefinder, and it wasn't all about focal length.

Prevalent poor eyesight is the reason :D
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,101
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
Proportionally correct for the Barnacks form factor and the majority of other brands as well - such VF/RF sizes were traditional back then. Past 1950's people got used to larger ones.

True! Some cameras of that era had even tinier viewfinders.

On the other hand i have an Ensign Selfix 820 (1956) with a huge viewfinder, and it appears that it was one of the selling points of the machine.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom