My SL2 will take 1,2, or 3 cam lenses. For metering I believe you need 3 cam. 3 Cam is all I have since I also have a R7. The SL has a slightly narrower throat and will not that the gorgeous 24mm. Maybe some other exotic lenses but I don't remember. They won't work with ROM lenses since some ROM lenses have no cams. An advantage to the SL2/SL bodies is that they are strictly mechanical and can be worked on by any decent repair person.The Leicaflex models are quite a bit older and technically distinct from the R series – especially in terms of lens compatibility (single vs. two/three-cam). Since many of the later R lenses can’t be used properly on a Leicaflex, it might make more sense to start a separate thread for those.
Already a new contribution!
Today I received Brian Long’s book on the Leica R series. While it’s a bit smaller than expected—more compact and slimmer than a full-sized coffee table book—it’s a very nice item and would make an ideal gift for any Leica R enthusiast.
The book starts with some company background and then dives into the origins of the Leicaflex SL, before spending quite a few pages on the R3 and its relationship with Minolta—why Portugal, shared components, and all that. Every R model is given due attention, interspersed with full-page photographs and a wealth of reproduced period brochures and advertisements. Japanese marketing material is featured throughout the book as well.
It ends with the R8/R9, and it’s interesting to see how Leica was already using the familiar gunmetal grey cardboard boxes seen with later digital models.
A miniature but important detail: the book is printed in a pleasantly legible font—not too small—which makes it easy to read in dim light while sitting on the sofa. A real plus for enjoying this kind of book.
All in all, a lovely read—written in a semi-colloquial, quite personal tone, and attention to detail. Recommended!
this is the place to celebrate its strengths
+1I'd suggest deleting this thread, in the interest of keeping Leica R prices low.
I remember when the Leica R4 and R5 were new in the shop windows, along with the lenses. The prices were insane compared to those of their Japanese competitors. Today, I wonder what added value they offered.
Andreas you would really enjoy the book I mentioned above. It is more than just one of these books about technical products. The author should be applauded for some good story-telling, and an eclectic choice of illustrations and photos.
Just checked, there are the RRP when the cameras were new: Leica R6: 4198 DM, Leica M6: 3898 DM. Depending on which calculator/took you are using, that is about EUR 4000 today, for a SLR body without lens!!
Great stuff!
What I like a lot about Long's R book is how is looking at the camera market of the 1970s, the Japanese manufacturers against Leica, labour cost arbitrage etc. I
I'd suggest deleting this thread, in the interest of keeping Leica R prices low.
I'd suggest deleting this thread, in the interest of keeping Leica R prices low.
Could the dust particles be on the bottom of the prism itself? See if you can see them with the focus screen removed.@Andreas Thaler one question for you:
I have black specks visible in my R4's viewfinder. They seem to be "in focus", so conventional wisdom says "it must be the focus screen". I have now swapped the screens between R4 and R6 - but the dust pattern remains the same!! I have tried to clean the R4's screen in several way - no change.
Where else could the dirt be located? How can I remove it (not having your surgeon's fingers)? Or send the camera for a CLA?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?