cuthbert
Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
- Messages
- 822
- Format
- 35mm
I'm not authoritative....but I discussed directly with Don Goldberg and Sherry regarding the camera as well as Gus Lazzari. The Rangefinder is different. It is absolutely different than an M2 or M4. I have an M4 and an M3. There are no replacements....except a new M6. Totally different frame set. You cannot see 28mm frame lens as obstructed by the meter. Sherry has parts so fine...then Sherry. Minimum 550. The meter arm and mechanism is complex. I have a CL and it's nothing like that even though same cell. It's not bad at all to have an M5. It's tricky. Oh..and yeah...you cannot use the MR9 adapter to use 1.5v silver oxide as the battery door will not screw down correctly. Wein cells work or mercury if you have access. 60-100 to adjust voltage from DAG.....probably a worthwhile adjustment. Plus, if you send to an expert it should get a complete once over and that's another ???$$$
Respectfully speaking the 0.71 magnification viewfinder doesn't have the 28mm frame and even if I don't have the M2 I'm pretty sure that one doesn't either.
The arm and lightmeter mechanism is indeed different from every camera that ever existed in my experience but regarding the battery this story of the voltage is BS, I use the 1.5 V battery and I don't have problems with that, Castelli checked the lightmeter with that voltage and it's OK, but it appears there's a big myth on internet on the matter.
And I shoot colour film with that camera, never missed an exposure....these are few examples with Ektar 100, but I also used E-6:



People should chill down and enjoy their M5!