Leica M5 light leak

Arvee said:

Developed at home or commercially? The light leak along the bottom seems to intensify at intervals that match the sprocket holes which would indicate that perhaps the fogging occurred with the film outside the camera - perhaps a leaky changing bag? Need more info....

Click to expand...

Arvee said:

Hmmm, to me it looks as though the film was loaded on a reel and the outer spiral was exposed to light causing the first frames to fog and the edges of the inner spirals were fogged as well (the innermost frames would be protected but would still be edge fogged. Second theory: they resemble a roll of 120 that wasn't wound tight and the edges get fogged after removing from camera in daylight.
Intuitively, I can't see that a camera leak would cause this kind of fogging but I could very well be wrong. The M5 has a flip-up back like my M3 and if the bottom plate were leaking light it would affect the top edge of the film much more so than the bottom (top of neg closest to bottom plate). I still think it's a leaky sleeve on the changing bag - I've had similar experiences with cheap bags that produced the kind of fogging you're seeing. I changed my film loading from doing it in daylight to using the bag in a darkroom and the problem disappeared. I would examine the sleeve elastic on the bag and see if there is a possible weakness. I mostly had problems with 400 speed film and didn't see it happening with Pan F+.

Let us know what you find out, I am very curious as to what caused this problem.

Edit: were the two rolls loaded simultaneously into a two roll tank or processed separately?

Click to expand...

summicron1 said:

there is no way an M5 could cause this sort of fogging. It loads from the bottom, as i recall, just like the others -- and there's no light seals to replace, Leicas are machined to not need them.

I agree with the others -- this has to have happened outside the camera -- last time I had something similar it was when I took a roll of bulk loaded film out of my pocket and noticed the bottom cover of the canister had come off and was still rattling around in my pocket.

I quickly covered the bottom, went to the darkroom and replaced the canister cap -- and when i souped the roll I got results similar to this.

You need to inspect every step of the process -- if this is bulk film go into the darkroom and take about two feet out of the loader in the dark, roll it onto a reel and soup it and see if it has fog. Then have a look at your bulk loader, your canisters, everything.

Check the lid on the jobo developing tank -- was it on tight? This looks a LOT as if it got a light leak after you loaded it onto the reels. You say the two rolls looking the same makes you think it is not the tank -- but where else are the two rolls subject to the same forces or incidents?

Someone cracking the lid open after they are loaded, especially in dim light of a darkroom, would cause exactly this sort of fogging. Have you had your darkroom de-ghosted lately? Do you have gremlins? Small house apes that some folks call "children" who get curious about that round thing daddy has on the table?

Click to expand...

Sirius Glass said:

OP, how dark is the room that you use to load the film? My darkroom with the enlarger is not perfectly dark and I can get film fogged in there., so I use a Changing Room. https://www.freestylephoto.biz/25001-Photoflex-Changing-Room

Click to expand...

Pieter12 said:

The darkroom seems to be OK. I have been using this darkroom for that last year or so and never had this happened before. The 3 rolls of 120 I loaded minutes later came out fine.

Click to expand...

Pieter12 said:

The film was in factory canisters, not bulk loaded.
The film was loaded onto the developing reels the evening before, and the tanks (both 35 and 120) with lids and caps on were put in a black plastic bag (that photo paper is wrapped in), folded over and clipped closed. The darkroom was unlit the rest of the time until I processed everything the next morning. I thought about the possibility that the lid might not have been seated well (I reseated the ring the next morning), but how would the film that was toward the center of the tank be the most fogged? And both reels, top and bottom on the center post, fogged almost the same way. As you can see from the contact sheets, the first 6 frames are totally gone. Maybe that is the amount of film that would make one turn at that point on the reel. I will shoot another roll tomorrow, maybe switch to Tri-X and see what happens.

Click to expand...

summicron1 said:

Hmmm.

I am not familiar with jobo reels -- are they hollow, and when the light is on is there any way for light to go down through the lid and hit the reels that way?

i repeat, this is not the camera. And looking at the film, with the sharp-ish delineation where the total fog ends, it just looks as if the film was on a reel and the outside layer got fogged. And yet you say the fogged area was on the inside/center of the reel ...

hmmm. no clue. but it could not possibly have been the camera -- may want to shoot some infrared and see if there's a ghost hanging around.

Click to expand...

Patrick Robert James said:

Yup, sounds like you forgot the tube.

Click to expand...

bdial said:

One way to eliminate your darkroom or procedures as a cause is to shoot a roll of C-41 and have it processed in a commercial lab.

Click to expand...

Pieter12 said:

Just a delayed update. Processed a roll from the M5 and no apparent problems. The issue must have been Operator Error. Still not sure how, but glad this roll is fine.

Click to expand...

Trask said:

I was getting triangles of light exposure in the bottom left corner of some of my negative

Click to expand...

Trask said:

light was somehow getting down the film advance shaft (that drives the film sprocket roller) and onto the film.

Click to expand...