Latent images as conceptual art

Mother and child

A
Mother and child

  • 2
  • 0
  • 378
Sonatas XII-55 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-55 (Life)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2K
Rain supreme

D
Rain supreme

  • 4
  • 0
  • 2K
Coffee Shop

Coffee Shop

  • 7
  • 1
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,818
Messages
2,797,114
Members
100,043
Latest member
Julian T
Recent bookmarks
0

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,588
Format
35mm RF
You sometimes hear of well-known photographers leaving rolls or dark slides of unprocessed film after their death and I wondered if the demise of film and it’s chemical process know how, could mean that one day it maintains a special value in its latent image state? To process it may destroy the wonder of what it may behold. This may already be the case, but any thoughts?
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
You sometimes hear of well-known photographers leaving rolls or dark slides of unprocessed film after their death and I wondered if the demise of film and it’s chemical process know how, could mean that one day it maintains a special value in its latent image state? To process it may destroy the wonder of what it may behold. This may already be the case, but any thoughts?

Schroedinger's cat.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
Bugger tugging at the forelocks of the dear departed's celluloid record. I'm taking it all with me. There will be nothing for the world to stickybeak at! :smile:
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Johannes Brahms was always his own severest critic. When he knew he would soon die, he destroyed all but a very few of his unpublished manuscripts. He did this to ensure that he would be known for only his best work. Other artists have done the same thing. In most cases the fact that films were never developed indicates that the photographer did not believe they contained any memorable images.
 
OP
OP
cliveh

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,588
Format
35mm RF
Johannes Brahms was always his own severest critic. When he knew he would soon die, he destroyed all but a very few of his unpublished manuscripts. He did this to ensure that he would be known for only his best work. Other artists have done the same thing. In most cases the fact that films were never developed indicates that the photographer did not believe they contained any memorable images.

But did they?
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
But did they?

:laugh:


Considering that people buy old wines, never to drink them, and which may have gone bad in the bottle anyway, I'd say it could be not that far-fetched. If I somehow became famous, there's a few rolls of undeveloped Kodachrome in my freezer someone could speculate on.
 

ROL

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
795
Location
California
Format
Multi Format
...dark slides...

WTF?!? Indeed, all of my dark slides start out with latent images of AA's most famous negatives, But somehow when I develop the film, the transfer has failed and all I get is my own cruddy work.


...and I wondered if the demise of film...

Not if I and other APUGers have anything to do about it.


...To process it may destroy the wonder of what it may behold.

Precisely. That is why I've stopped all processing of film and paper. The mere thought of what is there now prevents me testing virtuality against reality. Tomorrow: I stop pressing the shutter as well. Mind Pictures, that is where it's really at man.


...but any thoughts?

Those are my correspondingly parsed and absurd thoughts, but then why bother posting them as they already existed in their latent state...:whistling:
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,197
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
I have bleached latent images -- maybe I should not have developed them. Perhaps manipulated latent images are worth more than straight latent images?
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
garry winogrand i think left 10,000 rolls of unprocessed film ...

i don't think much deserves to be permanent ... unless it is on the internet

sounds like a good art exhibit ...
just filmholders and spooled film
leaving it to the imagination of the viewer
what they may or may not be looking at ...

retina and other unstable images would be perfect for this, seeing they
decompose / are destroyed the moment they are made

great thread cliveh !!
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I think we should just sell sheet metal and rubber stock to people instead of finished cars, so they can imagine themselves driving a car that isn't complete. That would be great value.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
garry winogrand i think left 10,000 rolls of unprocessed film ...

i don't think much deserves to be permanent ... unless it is on the internet

sounds like a good art exhibit ...
just filmholders and spooled film
leaving it to the imagination of the viewer
what they may or may not be looking at ...

retina and other unstable images would be perfect for this, seeing they
decompose / are destroyed the moment they are made

great thread cliveh !!

Sounds more like an emotional issue than photography.
 

blansky

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
5,952
Location
Wine country, N. Cal.
Format
Medium Format
You sometimes hear of well-known photographers leaving rolls or dark slides of unprocessed film after their death and I wondered if the demise of film and it’s chemical process know how, could mean that one day it maintains a special value in its latent image state? To process it may destroy the wonder of what it may behold. This may already be the case, but any thoughts?

I have the most incredible and magnificent images in my head that I never bothered to take pictures of, never stopped the car, never put down my beer and snapped a picture.

When I croak they should put my head on display and people can walk by and know that those images are in there, but just far too magnificent for the likes of them to see.

The greatest pictures never taken.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Bugger tugging at the forelocks of the dear departed's celluloid record. I'm taking it all with me. There will be nothing for the world to stickybeak at! :smile:

If film was still celluloid, all the negatives could be made into a bomb, to be used in a modified Viking-type funeral.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid

batwister

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
913
Location
Midlands, UK
Format
Medium Format
This is like the "If a tree falls in a forest..." idea. And so, it's already been pondered and exhausted. If there are latent images hidden away in an artist's draw, is it art? Does it really exist? Do we care? Who are we? Please kill me? We've already reached that philosophical dead end with images that have been processed and printed. Why waste more brain cells?
 

hoffy

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
3,073
Location
Adelaide, Au
Format
Multi Format
maybe you're right, or maybe he just loved exposing film :wink:
the file cabinet was full ...
ziplock bags full of thousands of rolls of film

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl4f-QFCUek&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Zk1nkZ3-kE&feature=related


and his leica had so much film through it there was a film image on the pressure plate
http://www.cameraquest.com/LeicaM4G.htm

I think that Winogrand had an obsession, or even an addiction for taking photos - I would say it was on an emotional level for sure.

I actually think that the idea does have merit - if someone offered you a roll of exposed by not developed film that was taken by a master, would you buy it? I have to admit, it would be tempting. THe hardest part would be making sure that its authentic (just like the bits of the Cross that have been sold all over the world!)
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
I have the most incredible and magnificent images in my head that I never bothered to take pictures of, never stopped the car, never put down my beer and snapped a picture.

When I croak they should put my head on display and people can walk by and know that those images are in there, but just far too magnificent for the likes of them to see.

The greatest pictures never taken.

You too, eh?
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I think that Winogrand had an obsession, or even an addiction for taking photos - I would say it was on an emotional level for sure.

I actually think that the idea does have merit - if someone offered you a roll of exposed by not developed film that was taken by a master, would you buy it? I have to admit, it would be tempting. THe hardest part would be making sure that its authentic (just like the bits of the Cross that have been sold all over the world!)

If you assembled all the bits of the True Cross in all the churches in the world, Jesus would have had to be 14 feet tall with a 15 foot armspan.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom