Large format, small print?

Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 210
sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 4
  • 1
  • 246
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 267
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 3
  • 4
  • 313

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,199
Messages
2,787,744
Members
99,835
Latest member
Onap
Recent bookmarks
1
OP
OP
Arcturus

Arcturus

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
95
Format
Medium Format
Interesting you point that out because I see less difference from MF. I have one 6x9cm printed to 11x14in where I feel like I can see branches on the trees at the skyline, which is one of the looks that appeals to me, that I get from 4x5in... Which is to say that 6x9cm approaches 4x5in in that respect.
I actually very much like 6x9 and have a lot of 6x9 negatives, but I'm still trying to figure out how best to print them. I find traditional print sizes tend to crop off too much of the scene, but printing them proportionally with no cropping makes them difficult and more expensive to frame. I think some of my best shots are on 6x9 though.
 

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
when it comes to resolution and sharpness. I don't think it improves a photograph; it is nod a 'nice to have' in my world. In fact I'm almost entirely neutral to it, to the point where it doesn't really register.

At the same time, I appreciate a really well printed photograph, and in my darkroom I always strive for making the very best print that I can make. But that never has anything to do with resolution. Ever.

+100%
Amen.
 

NedL

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
3,390
Location
Sonoma County, California
Format
Multi Format
I actually very much like 6x9 and have a lot of 6x9 negatives, but I'm still trying to figure out how best to print them. I find traditional print sizes tend to crop off too much of the scene, but printing them proportionally with no cropping makes them difficult and more expensive to frame. I think some of my best shots are on 6x9 though.

I like the 1.5:1 aspect too. I saw this saunders easel post recently:
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

and if you look at the box in the photo, one of the "checkboxes" is "8x10 35mm full frame". I'll bet I'd like to have one of those. I wonder how hard it would be to find one. And yes standard frame sizes don't work all that well.. I'm thinking of buying a custom "sides and tops" in bulk. I also really like the old 122 format which is closer to 1.7:1. Custom framing needed for that aspect ratio too.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom