Thanks Ian! So, I guess there is no "standard" lens for this camera or its variants. Would the Tessar be the "top of the line" lens for cameras like this or is there another type that was more preferred at the time that this camera was manufactured. I have a small box of holders somewhere and will have to dig them out to see what I have.They came with various lenses, most common was a 105mm f4.5 Tessar. The problem is that often larger dealers bought in 6.5x9 and 9x12 cameras without lenses and carried a stock of suitable lenses separately.
This 1935 advert shows them with a Schneider Radionar or CZJ Tessar, Benno Thorsch was one of the founders of KW. I know that Meyer also sod the cameras with their lenses fitted for a white, they also sold Leica's with an f1.5 lens long before Leitz and also made an early version of the Visoflex.
I've definitely seen Patent Etui's with other lenses in dealers adverts in the British Journal Photographic Almanacs, and on Ebay. Often Dialytes were used as "Budget" lenses but that's not always the case as there were also high end Dialytes like the Eurynar. Goerz for instance offered 4 different Dialytes on their 9x12 cameras as well as the Dagor.
If you need KW plate holders I think I have 3 sets of 3 6.5x9, I may have some film inserts as well.
Ian
Are you saying the Steinheil Doppel Anastigmat Unofokal is a triplet?plain triplet and modified triplet
I had a Patent Etui that I ended up selling a few years back and I just picked up a Pocket Dalco with no lens on the auction site. I was just trying to figure out what lens came standard on that camera. I have the 105mm Tessar and the 105mm Steinheil Unofocal. I know I have some other 105mm lenses stuck somewhere, but just have to dig to find them. I think I'm going to stick the Steinheil Unofokal on it for now. I also like Dialyte lenses and have the 165mm Eurynar that I use when I want a "certain look" with my 4x5 Toyo field camera. It works nicely as long as the sun is behind you or not in the frame. JohnWI have a Patent Etui with a Tessar I bought in Prague over 20 years ago. Personally I prefer Dialytes, but what Ian said above it all true. I have a Rodenstock Eurynar 150mm f/3.5 that I would love to get coated one day. Nice lens.
You haven't stated why you are curious though. Are you looking to buy one, or just wondering? They are pretty remarkable cameras. It is hard to believe that they fold up into such a tiny space. You'd have to see it to believe it.
Are you saying the Steinheil Doppel Anastigmat Unofokal is a triplet?
That;s true, but are you saying or do you know for sure that the Pocket Dalco cameras usually came with a triplet lens?You asked about the typical lenses for this family of cameras.
You did not ask about the Unofacal, which even only was used at two versions.
I agree with you about the information not being available, since I've searched everywhere to no avail. Ian's explanation seems to be realistic in that dealers had their own ideas as to what lens should go on these cameras. JohnWI do not know such camera.
The KW Patent Etui 6.5x9 models as said came typically all with plain and modified triplets. Per model two plain triplets against one Tessar are listed.
But that does not say anything about the actual numbers these versions were made in. And I doubt there is such information available.
You asked about the typical lenses for this family of cameras.
You did not ask about the Unofacal, which even only was used at two versions.
I have a Patent Etui with a Tessar I bought in Prague over 20 years ago. Personally I prefer Dialytes, but what Ian said above it all true. I have a Rodenstock Eurynar 150mm f/3.5 that I would love to get coated one day. Nice lens.
You haven't stated why you are curious though. Are you looking to buy one, or just wondering? They are pretty remarkable cameras. It is hard to believe that they fold up into such a tiny space. You'd have to see it to believe it.
I agree with you about the information not being available, since I've searched everywhere to no avail. Ian's explanation seems to be realistic in that dealers had their own ideas as to what lens should go on these cameras. JohnW
Ian,
That's good to know that the Unofocal was considered a "top end" Dialyte in the Steinheil lineup.. I've never used this 105mm Unofokal to see what it could do. I am a little curious as to what would make the Rodenstock Eurynar better than the Seinheil Unofocal since they are both four element - four group lenses. Is it just in the type of mineral compound used in making the glass? JohnW
jpd,I have one with Unofokal and another one with a Meyer Helioplan, both dialytes.
jpd,
If you are saying you have a Pocket Dalco with a Unofokal you are the first person I have known that has a Pocket Dalco. I'm sure there are other folks that have the camera, but they sure don't seem to common. JohnW
JPD,It's a Patent Etui. It's one of those cameras that were bought in and sold by different companies using their own names. The Unofokal was one of the standard lenses KW used, and the Meyer Helioplan was another one. Here's a Pocket Dalco with Helioplan: https://www.flickr.com/photos/126027782@N03/albums/72157662382062165
Tessar in 105 and 120 mm were also common on the Patent Etui, and also Schneider Xenar and Radionar, and Meyer Trioplan. Very few had Plaubel or Leitz lenses.
I'm not sure what Dalco stands for, but there was a "Dalco" brand name used by a manufacturer of film and photo papers in the Netherlands, NFI: http://www.cameramuseum.nl/dalco.htm
JPD,
I see by the picture of the camera you posted, that the Dalco brand label was placed on a 9x12cm version also. I appreciate the info about the camera. What Agx pointed to on a Dalco film brand makes me think the Dalco cameras are somehow tied to the company that made or distributed the Dalco brand of film. The Pocket Dalco I purchased has a maroon body and maroon bellows as well. I'll post a picture of it when I get a chance. JohnW
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?