Konica iiia 50mms vs 48mm

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,931
Messages
2,798,994
Members
100,081
Latest member
Yevhenii
Recent bookmarks
0

alfu

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
25
Format
35mm
Does anyone know the difference in performance between these two lenses? Which one is sharper wide open? Thanks.
 

macfred

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
3,839
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Not from my own experiences - I only have the Konica III with the Hexanon 48mm f/2. In my eyes it's very sharp in the range of up to 3-4 meters.
Like any other lens the Hexanon likes to be stopped down one ore two apertures.

Dante Stella says : ... the 50/1.8 is sharper, and its shutter is easier to have fixed ... http://www.dantestella.com/technical/koni3.html
A worth reading report !
 

Trask

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
1,935
Location
Virginia (northern)
Format
35mm RF
I have the IIIa with 50mm f/1.8, but as I don't have the 48mm f/2 it's hard for me to make any definitive statement as to comparative sharpness. I will say that my IIIa has a wonderful viewfinder, and when I had it CLA'd I had the interlink between f/stop and shutter speed disabled, so that each could be set independently of the other -- the EV system interlock really slowed down adjustments. My IIIa is perhaps the quietest camera I own; it's leaf shutter has a very soft sound when released.
 
OP
OP

alfu

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
25
Format
35mm
Thanks. I once had a 48mm f2 on an SII which produced wonderful images, but wondering whether i should get the 50mm f1.8 version or not. One thing I did not like was the pentagonal aperture blades.
 
OP
OP

alfu

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
25
Format
35mm
I bit the bullet for the 50mm version. Will be able to compare it to my other one.
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,749
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I bit the bullet for the 50mm version. Will be able to compare it to my other one.
I hope you report back with your findings. I'm curious as to which is the better lens. I had the III with 48mm f2 and loved that lens for the way it rendered a scene. Sharp, but not to sharp so to speak.
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,843
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
I will be so happy when this "wide open" fascination has run it's course. Just my personal rant. But if you must, I have found the Helios-44-2 to be exquisite. If you can find a way to mount it to your Konica it would be worth the effort. The lens is super cheap and is quite sharp when stopped down.
 
OP
OP

alfu

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
25
Format
35mm
Eric, unfortunately wide open is the only way of getting perfect highlight circles in the bokeh. And, yes, I've had people tell me not to worry about the highlight shapes, but I've used the 48mm f2 lens and I find the pentagons very distracting.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom