Paul Verizzo
Member
As one who has spent decades trying film and developers with no official suggestions for ideas that interest me, well, well, well.
I was cleaning up my shelf of photo books and literature came across this 1980 Kodak Darkroom Data Guide. I'm about to do another long run of tests/fun/frustrations and I immediately wondered if The Great Yellow Father had any thoughts on this matter, and sure enough, he does! The guide assigns a "Develop Number" to some films and developers, see the picture. Sadly. for this purpose, many of them have gone to that great Kodak graveyard leaving only nostalgia to tease us.
I've toyed around with the concept myself. The only one I can remember with certainly was wanting to develop Plus-X in DK-50. I can't remember if it was stock or 1:1. The DK-50 data sheet lists time for Tri-X, just like this guide, with PX Not Recommended, for what reason I can't fathom. Anyway, I used the D-76 times for PX and TX and then did a ratio to get a DK-50 time. It was perfect.
Anyone have any Development Number experiences or thoughts?
One thought I had about potential error is that hydroquinone has a very steep temperature reaction. That may not be the proper term. In other words for every degree of temperature change, it changes more than metol. Might there be a difference in accuracy with these DN's between a normal MQ developer with a lot of HQ compared to the much lesser amount in DK-50? I'm probably overthinking this......
I was cleaning up my shelf of photo books and literature came across this 1980 Kodak Darkroom Data Guide. I'm about to do another long run of tests/fun/frustrations and I immediately wondered if The Great Yellow Father had any thoughts on this matter, and sure enough, he does! The guide assigns a "Develop Number" to some films and developers, see the picture. Sadly. for this purpose, many of them have gone to that great Kodak graveyard leaving only nostalgia to tease us.
I've toyed around with the concept myself. The only one I can remember with certainly was wanting to develop Plus-X in DK-50. I can't remember if it was stock or 1:1. The DK-50 data sheet lists time for Tri-X, just like this guide, with PX Not Recommended, for what reason I can't fathom. Anyway, I used the D-76 times for PX and TX and then did a ratio to get a DK-50 time. It was perfect.
Anyone have any Development Number experiences or thoughts?
One thought I had about potential error is that hydroquinone has a very steep temperature reaction. That may not be the proper term. In other words for every degree of temperature change, it changes more than metol. Might there be a difference in accuracy with these DN's between a normal MQ developer with a lot of HQ compared to the much lesser amount in DK-50? I'm probably overthinking this......
Attachments
Last edited: