Kodak XXXX 2468: perforated or not? (not 2462?)

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,028
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Found a roll online that I’m interested in getting, but I want to know if it’s perforated. If it is, then I’m absolutely going to get it. If not, I’ll have to think on it a bit. However, I have seen that both perforated and unperforated versions seem to exist. So, how can I tell the difference??
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,028
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,780
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Sorry, the link did not make it, but I will say that most suppliers of that stock I find online are microfilm supply houses.

Chances are better than not it is not perforated, but that's just a wild guess.
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,028
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Sorry, the link did not make it, but I will say that most suppliers of that stock I find online are microfilm supply houses.

Chances are better than not it is not perforated, but that's just a wild guess.

Oops, forgot to attach it. Here it is if that helps:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0011.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 73

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,780
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
PM sent with brochure on Duplicating Films.

No real answers on perforations, but a lot of good info...
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I've changed your thread title.
Unless my eyes fail me, that label is for 2468, not 2462 microfilm.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
PM sent with brochure on Duplicating Films.

No real answers on perforations, but a lot of good info...

Any chance that is in pdf form, and small enough to be shared here?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,028
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
I've changed your thread title.
Unless my eyes fail me, that label is for 2468, not 2462 microfilm.

Yes, I made a typo in the title, oops.

And yes, I have seen that PDF, unfortunately that doesn’t help answer my question.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
My interpretation of that is that only the 100-ft. rolls (Sp.663) are perforated.

I would agree.
The pictured catalog number doesn't have "perf" as part of the description:

And thanks for posting that Kino.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,810
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,028
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
I would agree.
The pictured catalog number doesn't have "perf" as part of the description:
View attachment 372673
And thanks for posting that Kino.

Damn. Might reach out to Svema to see if they can perf it, buuut I think this idea is dead. Oh well…
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,318
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
typically Microfilm is used unperfed. (more image area that way!) {in a past life I must have shot 30,000 feet of the stuff in 16mm.}
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,028
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Out of curiosity, has anyone actually shot this film? Do you know if it degrades poorly with age? I have been told reversal film may age differently than many other ultra-low speed film.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…