Kodak Warning + Later Clarification

Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 0
  • 9
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 16
High st

A
High st

  • 6
  • 0
  • 56
Flap

D
Flap

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,216
Messages
2,788,006
Members
99,838
Latest member
HakuZLQ
Recent bookmarks
2

gbroadbridge

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
530
Location
Sydney, Australia
Format
Multi Format
Film is complicated to make, there is nothing complicated about its distribution.

As an importer of a large range of products myself from various countries, I can think of many complex issues surrounding import and distribution of film.

Statutory labelling issues, Hazard management, environmental compliance issues, local regulations, damage during transport, taxes, management of batch numbers and expiry dates, just off the top of my head.
 

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
593
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Yeah, the car things wasn't the best analogy, but CarMax is just another middleman, charging the end consumer a premium to hide all the annoying details, that's what the $2k delivery fee and inflated prices are for, I assume.

Exactly. It also illustrates that a middle man can indeed value (e.g. convenience) and make a solid business from that. My understanding is that CarMax has pretty healthy profit margins, even though nobody is forced to buy from them.

To try to bring the conversation back to Kodak, I do not wish for Kodak Alaris to just disappear. I wish for Eastman Kodak to be able to choose whichever distributor they want. If Alaris is better at distributing Kodak film than anyone else, then kudos to them.
 

0x001688936CA08

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
90
Location
PNW
Format
Large Format
To try to bring the conversation back to Kodak, I do not wish for Kodak Alaris to just disappear. I wish for Eastman Kodak to be able to choose whichever distributor they want. If Alaris is better at distributing Kodak film than anyone else, then kudos to them.

Agree 100%
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,762
Format
35mm
We need to continue to rally them to produce a Kodachrome biased E6.

I think they should. They have the most recognized product name in photography and are just sitting on it. Yes, those that know will say it's not real Kodachrome but the kid'll get a kick out of shooting Kodachrome branded film. It'll fly off the shelves.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
3,073
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
I think they should. They have the most recognized product name in photography and are just sitting on it. Yes, those that know will say it's not real Kodachrome but the kid'll get a kick out of shooting Kodachrome branded film. It'll fly off the shelves.

If I owned Kodak and had any budget at all I would spend it developing E6 Kodachrome for exactly that reason, and (I hate the following idea but would do it anyway) Kodachrome C41 too... because C41 is where the volume is today, and that’s not changing anytime soon. It’s real film from Grandfather Kodak after all, and if it renders color like Kodachrome, call it that. Then market the hell out of it.

All problems solved. How much is my bonus, boss? 🙂
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,550
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
I remember Kodachrome for sale with processing mailers here in the US. But it was simpler just to have the owner of the tiny country store drop it off in person once a week down in the city an hour away, then pick up the slides the next week. Certain things he never ran out of were gallons of rotgut jug wine, rifle and shotgun ammo, blue jeans, and Kodachrome plus Kodak Gold. You could also count on bottles of orange soda and chocolate soda being in the cooler alongside 7Up and Coke. Oh, fishing lures too.

Did he use an Excel worksheet to keep track of all that stuff? :smile:
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,550
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Transitioning to a direct web sales model would probably be a nightmare for Kodak, and involve far more staff than they currently need for office support and shipping. And even in high volume mode, there could be nightmares in how the product gets handled beyond their control. That kind of scenario is really what killed off Cibachrome in the US. It's not so simple. But as it is, they seem legally committed to Alaris, which is really the party which needs to be leveraged into modernizing the distribution.

One wonders what the new owners of Alaris are doing the last 1 1/2 years since buying them?
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,550
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
My understanding is that the Fujifilm store operated on Amazon is directly operated by Fujifilm, with distribution by Amazon.
You can often buy cheaper through a reseller, but with less availability.

I once bought Kodak film from Amazon here in New Jersey USA. The expiration date was only four months hence. I returned it and contacted the actual seller. All their film was short dates unlike let's say photo companies like B&H Photo in NYC where the normal 1 1/2 years expiration dates for their film. That tells me the Amazon sellers must be buying up soon-to-expire film being dumped at low prices and reselling it on Amazon for a nice profit. So my recommendation is to stick with known photo sources in the business.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,550
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
The middle man adds nothing to the world except paper work. Ford should have Ford dealerships run by Ford employees with Ford mechanics. I buy your car and want your people working on it. Dealerships play games, as soon as they see you're not an easy mark you're worthless to them.

Dealers are often so many, a central ownership would be too great to operate and pay for. That's why McDonald's, car manufacturers, Dunkin', etc operate with local separate ownership. Plus there's more incentive when one guy owns one or a few local stores and is also part of the nearby community. Also, the manufacturers, if they owned the local dealer, would still have to make a profit on its operation. So they'd be selling your unnecessary add-ons and services you don;lt need. If you're unhappy with dealer service, go to independent service mechanics. Many are pretty crooked as well. :wink:
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,550
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, the car things wasn't the best analogy, but CarMax is just another middleman, charging the end consumer a premium to hide all the annoying details, that's what the $2k delivery fee and inflated prices are for, I assume.

I sold my car recently and got an offer from CarMax and another similar company $4000 and $4400. I went to a local used car dealer and the manager offered me $5000. I told the manager to have the owner call me, whom I told I wouldn;t accept less than $5500, which he agreed to it. Online car dealers seem to offer less than local dealers. I still wonder how much I left on the table, maybe two to three thousand, but they have to make a profit too. I just didn't want the hassle of selling to a private owner.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,762
Format
35mm
If I owned Kodak and had any budget at all I would spend it developing E6 Kodachrome for exactly that reason, and (I hate the following idea but would do it anyway) Kodachrome C41 too... because C41 is where the volume is today, and that’s not changing anytime soon. It’s real film from Grandfather Kodak after all, and if it renders color like Kodachrome, call it that. Then market the hell out of it.

All problems solved. How much is my bonus, boss? 🙂

Heck, make a black and white one too. Whatever it takes. Cool names like Panatomic-X should be back too. Who cares if its rebranded double X, just market it.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,593
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Taking profits.
Kingwood era started 2 Aug 2024, so a few weeks are missing. This information, of course, does not address profitability but hopefully there is plenty. When the next KA financials are released everyone will know more on that topic.
KodakAlaris.JPG
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,262
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
One wonders what the new owners of Alaris are doing the last 1 1/2 years since buying them?

For a chunk of that time, probably dealing with figuring out how to do business in an international marketplace in a rapidly changing and crazily unpredictable world.
I'm not aware of any changes in management - perhaps others may have seen announcements.
AFAIK, Kodak Alaris is still a UK corporation and I'm not aware of any steps taken to change that.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,593
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Seems like only one new face in the "Corporate office":


Kodak Alaris logo
President
Kodak Alaris ·
Full-time
7 mos Feb 2025 to Present · 7 mos
Atlanta Metropolitan Area ·
Hybrid
 

brbo

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2,149
Location
EU
Format
Multi Format
When the next KA financials are released everyone will know more on that topic.

Why would they still (agan?) release financial reports to public?

Last such report that they were required to publish was on fiscal year ending March 2023.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom