Kodak Update On Film Sale

Nothing

A
Nothing

  • 1
  • 0
  • 62
Where Did They Go?

A
Where Did They Go?

  • 6
  • 4
  • 185
Red

D
Red

  • 5
  • 3
  • 176
The Big Babinski

A
The Big Babinski

  • 2
  • 6
  • 207

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,034
Messages
2,768,600
Members
99,537
Latest member
alvarodiazphoto
Recent bookmarks
0

kb3lms

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
1,004
Location
Reading, PA
Format
35mm
IIRC building 38 is the long building over off of Weiland Rd. Scroll to the left on the map in the link and down a bit to where 390 and Ridgeway Ave cross. Look up just a bit to the right. it's long and narrow. But never having worked at Kodak Park my building numbering may be off. I forget what number building is at the corner of Lake and Ridge.

The Park has been decimated! Perez certainly has done his handiwork well.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,249
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Only 3 real options for Kodak film.

1. Fujifilm
2. Ilford
3. Employee buyout.

Anyone else will either be Wall Street hacks or people who have no idea how to run a film company. Private equity would be a DISASTER for Kodak.

1. Why would they want to run a company on another continent?
2. Why would they want to run a company on another continent? They do not have the money.
3. Just what we need a bunch of people with more money than brains, jump in to run a business that they know nothing about.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
1. Why would they want to run a company on another continent?
2. Why would they want to run a company on another continent? They do not have the money.
3. Just what we need a bunch of people with more money than brains, jump in to run a business that they know nothing about.

The employees know nothing about it? I've worked many places where that would have been the only way to make it profitable.

OTOH, I can't imagine enough employees are interested AND have enough money.
 

Yashinoff

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
193
Format
35mm
1. Why would they want to run a company on another continent?
2. Why would they want to run a company on another continent? They do not have the money.
3. Just what we need a bunch of people with more money than brains, jump in to run a business that they know nothing about.

Kodak is not selling the manufacturing facilities. They're selling the retail business - the trademarks, kiosks, etc. Some of this could potentially have use for Fujifilm... but I feel like they probably wouldn't see the point in going to Kodak for the supply side of things, it would probably not be a good thing for us on the consumer end. Plus a lot of what they're tying into the deal is "junk", the buyer would have to axe a lot of stuff I'd think.
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
1. Why would they want to run a company on another continent?
2. Why would they want to run a company on another continent? They do not have the money.
3. Just what we need a bunch of people with more money than brains, jump in to run a business that they know nothing about.

Fujifilm runs companies all over the world including several in North America. One more will be no big deal to them.
 

michaelbsc

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
2,103
Location
South Caroli
Format
Multi Format
Fujifilm runs companies all over the world including several in North America. One more will be no big deal to them.

Only if it makes money. I've worked for one of those Fuji America companies on several contracts. While they are perfectly willing to spend the money required to do the job to get the product they want/need, they are not willing to throw good money after bad.

I suppose if it was a product that was a matter of Fuji's internal corporate pride they would probably go to pretty great lengths to save face, just like many oriental cultures.


But you can bet they aren't going to spend a dime to save an American product unless it is a profit center for them. Or at least they perceive it can become a profit center.
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Only if it makes money. I've worked for one of those Fuji America companies on several contracts. While they are perfectly willing to spend the money required to do the job to get the product they want/need, they are not willing to throw good money after bad.

I suppose if it was a product that was a matter of Fuji's internal corporate pride they would probably go to pretty great lengths to save face, just like many oriental cultures.


But you can bet they aren't going to spend a dime to save an American product unless it is a profit center for them. Or at least they perceive it can become a profit center.

We all hope Kodak film is profitable. And if it is, then Fujifilm could add a few bucks to their stash. Fujifilm has some holes in their film line (at least in 120 film). No ISO400 b & w as well as a highly saturated ISO400 color film.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom