How I see it, the demand for motion picture film and photographic film hasn't declined (at least demand for motion picture film might have even grown). That's a good thing. I do wonder what those vendor transition costs they mention are...
I'm not sure how you see such a good situation. Year-to-date Kodak's Consumer Film Division has lost 10 million dollars, vs a profit of 18 million dollars last year prior year. That's a nearly 30 million dollar swing to the down side.
I just read the conference call transcript from the CEO and CFO. Not one mention of any improvement in film sales.
Not one of Kodak's divisions experienced an increase in revenue in the past quarter. All 7 divisions saw a drop in sales or at best, flat.
Kodak stock is at an all time post-bankruptcy low.
This part was interesting:
Analyst: And then, with regards to potential asset sales, how are you thinking about divestitures? I know you mentioned they would go to debt pay down, but I'm curious as to, as you're shutting down some of these technologies in that, that you had, is it possible to monetize some of them? And even maybe bigger divisions within Kodak?
CEO: Yes, again, we're in dialogue, I mean, Shannon, so I can't share a lot of detail because we're in dialogue with them, and I noted, with multiple parties. Clearly, we are doing very well in certain businesses and some of our businesses are now starting to be subscale. And some of those that are subscale, we'll obviously, we'll look at, and the ones that are going well, we hope to get more focused behind. In terms of technologies and IP, while we're going to shut down a significant piece of our advanced research and development of material science products, we do still believe that there are parties out there who are interested in licensing and buying some of those intellectual property assets and pre-commercialization activity. And so we'll work toward that as well.
Is film now running at scale in Kodak's eyes? That's the key question. Sadly, no one asked it.