The Kodachrome trademark has value. I have never heard anybody singing "Mama don't take my FujiChrome Velvia RVP 50 away".
As an actual film there are real issues, especially to the hipster and new photographer crowd - one of the most pressing to new users is that it is more difficult to scan, in addition to complexities in manufacturing and development. My concern is that at some point the Kodachrome trademark will be bought by a Lupus Imaging type entity which will rebrand some old E-6 film found in a warehouse as Kodachrome.
Although I miss the film, I remind myself that I last shot a roll in January 1982. To be honest, most of my Kodachrome emotion is related to the loss of an era, not the loss of an emulsion - it was the film of my youth. I wonder if many of the Kodachrome revivalists have the same motivation.
... 60Nobody cares about Kodachrome. Certainly not anyone under 50. No one cares.
Nobody cares about Kodachrome. Nobody.
Although I miss the film, I remind myself that I last shot a roll in January 1982. To be honest, most of my Kodachrome emotion is related to the loss of an era, not the loss of an emulsion - it was the film of my youth. I wonder if many of the Kodachrome revivalists have the same motivation.
So who are they; where are they?
Nobody cares about Kodachrome.
... 60
Good point. I haven’t been able to identify the hoards of people clamoring for Ektachrome, either. I suppose that will be a good test for the notion that (insert any film name) large-scale demand is but 1 marketing campaign away.Guys, this is an interesting thread about the resurrection of Ektachrome, let's keep it on topic please.
Good point. I haven’t been able to identify the hoards of people clamoring for Ektachrome
True, very true, but could be a small market in terms of the required production, sales, and profit for supporting a viable commercial product. I’m not sure how many that “significant number” (people or rolls of film sold) really is or how much is required for commercial viability. Film for us film photography enthusiasts has lived off the back of Hollywood and US Government for years. If they are buying enough we will benefit; if not... who knows how long niche products will survive.But you have to admit that, at least on “analog” photography websites and forums (like Photrio), there is a significant number of people anxiously waiting for the new Ektachrome.
OTOH, in these very same websites, most people are very realistic about the possibility of Kodak ever bringing back that other film which name starts with a “K”.
Will Ektachrome be viable without the new Kodak Super8 camera? It chews up film 10 rolls at a time.Haven't heard much about it recently.
And with the price now $2500 or higher for the new camera, how viable is it anyway?Will Ektachrome be viable without the new Kodak Super8 camera? It chews up film 10 rolls at a time.Haven't heard much about it recently.
Nobody cares about Kodachrome. Certainly not anyone under 50. No one cares.
I don't know anything about the educational film market, which is supposed to be what Kodak is aiming for. I also don't know the projected cost of a Super8 cartridge. If a 50ft cartridge is going to be $100, which is about the same as 10 rolls of film, and that is for 2-3 minutes run time, $2500 for the camera itself sounds like a drop in the bucket.And with the price now $2500 or higher for the new camera, how viable is it anyway?
Even with it I’m skeptical that the volume will be sufficient unless Hollywood starts a large enough scale usage.Will Ektachrome be viable without the new Kodak Super8 camera? It chews up film 10 rolls at a time.Haven't heard much about it recently.
Well, every educational film I’ve seen for at least the past decade has been an educational video. And to think, I once developed and produced educational slide-tape presentations. Beep (audio cue to advance the slide). We thought we were brilliant when we could use the inaudible tone to automatically advance the slide. And OMG, we thought ourselves God-like when using two slides in a dissolve...I don't know anything about the educational film market, which is supposed to be what Kodak is aiming for. I also don't know the projected cost of a Super8 cartridge. If a 50ft cartridge is going to be $100, which is about the same as 10 rolls of film, and that is for 2-3 minutes run time, $2500 for the camera itself sounds like a drop in the bucket.
this might be true it is a marketing blitz away but without the infrastructure to process the filmFollowers of fads who are just one marketing push away!
But did you check on motion picture forums, instead of still photography ones?Good point. I haven’t been able to identify the hoards of people clamoring for Ektachrome, either.
I am well below 50 and both know about it, have used it and care(d) for it a lot.Nobody cares about Kodachrome. Certainly not anyone under 50. No one cares.
But did you check on motion picture forums, instead of still photography ones?
...
I am well below 50
...
I visited Unique Photo today in New Jersey, and asked if they have heard anything lately about Ektachrome. "No", was the answer. They did have T-Max P3200 in stock in 135 format.
Dodd Photo here has loads of P3200. I'm unsure if it's shifting at any volume.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?