If I remember correct such situations in the past - it is allways the same procedure.Tried calling Kodak Alaris. They have no one you can talk to about their professional films. I had to email them on it. Doesn't seem they support the film people anymore by phone which is sad, as sometimes you need certain information that email takes too long to get.
I think i also read that same quote from them posted from them earlier this month.Well how about that. The day after I made the post above, Alaris contacts me. I wonder if they are following this forum? Anyway he had this to say:
"Activity is now focused on narrow coating work to optimize curve shape, based on what was learned in the first wide event. Given the progress to-date, we are optimistic that the new film could be generally available in Q1 of 2018."
I worry about the price point after they announced that the 8mm camera was going to be more than triple what they said initially.
I worry about the price point after they announced that the 8mm camera was going to be more than triple what they said initially. I understand some price adjustments the closer a product gets to market but that much? Who is the camera aimed for now? Pros don't use Super 8 and the average amateur would mostly likely not pay that much.
Early announcement
Latest announcement
I hope Ektachrome doesn't land on the wrong side of $10.
Umm, you're wrong about the 'pros don't use super-8' - the precise reason this camera exists is to service the demand for a new, reliable way of shooting S8 in production environments when the aesthetic of S8 is called for - be it for promo films, music videos or for certain shots in shorts/ features. That it's going to be available in the 2.5-3k price band is remarkable - the smallest cinema quality silent S16 camera (Aaton A-Minima) was about 20K I recall. This is about making a camera that can produce images of a broadcastable/ streamable quality, that's still easy to operate.
For that matter, I'd be more convinced of the viability of the 'Reflex' camera project if its founders had an aim price in the same range.
I see Kodak's target audience for Super 8 cameras and film as film students, with the hope that these upcoming film-makers will graduate to 35mm film. But even in that case, existing negative films make more sense, since the end product is likely to be digital. Ektachrome would allow a filmmaker to edit the original film and project it without having to have a print made, but I don't see a big market for color silent films.
I see Kodak's target audience for Super 8 cameras and film as film students, with the hope that these upcoming film-makers will graduate to 35mm film.
A cinematograpy student buying a 3000€ camera? And how many film academies still teach analog photography? That all would be a very small market.
It's going to continue to be delayed. It may not come at all if Kodak goes bankrupt again before mid-2018.
It's going to continue to be delayed. It may not come at all if Kodak goes bankrupt again before mid-2018.
It's going to continue to be delayed. It may not come at all if Kodak goes bankrupt again before mid-2018.
It's going to continue to be delayed. It may not come at all if Kodak goes bankrupt again before mid-2018.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?