Ok, so all out madness and speculation is going to start here in the forum? I'm all in then!!
Bring back..
Kodachrome 25, 64, 200, the never released Kodachrome 400
Ektachrome 64T, 320T, Elite Chrome "Extra Color", EPP 100, EIR
Kodak Gold 100
Plus-X
Verichrome Pan
Panatomic-X
Royal-X Pan
TMZ
Tri-X Pan Professional
and of course Technical Pan
... i want all of them in 220 format and in 70mm perforated rolls as well...
Yeaaaaaahhhhhhhh
So what films do you want to see back?Personally, I think Kodak will have failed bitterly if they do not reintroduce the 1950s.
How ironic! Then again, bringing back Kodachrome and its developing infrastructure would be much more difficult than just Ektachrome. Also, many people charge against film in general because of its chemistry (one of those myths too).Kodachrome is not in the current plans. AFAIK, it used no banned chemistry!
A pilot coater will have to be revived to test small batches. Whether this is in KRL or the plant remains to be seen. AFAIK, J8 is still in use in B-59 and the 21" machine still exists in the plant. J8 can coat 8 layers at a time or with tandem coating, up to 16 layers.
PE
Personally, I think Kodak will have failed bitterly if they do not reintroduce the 1950s.
How ironic! Then again, bringing back Kodachrome and its developing infrastructure would be much more difficult than just Ektachrome. Also, many people charge against film in general because of its chemistry (one of those myths too).
Of course someone must have given a thought at it, but dismissed because of what it is.
There was a podcast in Inside Analog Photo (sadly lost now?) about 2009-10 maybe, and I don't remember if it was Bob shanebrook the interviewee, but he mentioned that keeping Kodak E6 around was thanks to some downsizing they were able to do. B38 facilities in mind. Don't know if that Pilot facilities could give final product, which is what Ferrania is doing after all. Though I don't envision Kodak (Alaris) releasing small batches of legacy products. Then the extensive R&D for all of them. Mirko of Adox reminds how even introducing a B&W product is a sizeable endeavor.
...
Oh, and add EIR-Aerochrome to the list.
Going back to classical economic theory, then it will be time when someone makes them. Some models have even appreciated, specifically some Medium Format cameras. Fuji/Voigtlander saw their niche and ran a batch of 5000 medium format cameras (that was in '08 though), but someone could very well do something similar. Mint introduced an instant TLR a while ago.No new cameras to support and promote sales.This is looking more and more like a knee jerk reaction to a fad in retro culture that could end in disaster when the neophytes can't find skilled repairmen to get their old clunkers working.
Why reinvent old film when they have the opportunity to develop (no pun intended) new film.The issue isn't with production, distribution, chemicals etc. the problem is with sales.The have to be able to sell at enough of a profit this new product to justify its existence.Slide film is a niche within a niche.
No new cameras to support and promote sales.This is looking more and more like a knee jerk reaction to a fad in retro culture that could end in disaster when the neophytes can't find skilled repairmen to get their old clunkers working.
Kodunk dropped Kodachrome because of lack of sales, there aren't more people interested in film now, the numbers are static. People moved on to other formats and some new people took up film, but there is not a rise in film interest that I can see.Evidence of this is the steady drop in prices of used cameras, people can't give them away.
I'd like to see a top performing slide film on the market,but at the price point it is at now, you won't see participation increase.
yeah but then they have to reintroduce the Saturn V first because, as we all know, Elvis is alive and well and living on the Moon (with Buddy Holly and the Big Bopper).And Elvis too...
as we have seen, Kodak have a new Super8 camera, whats it to say that kodak wont release a new 35mm camera either?
There were no S-8 cameras made for decades. Until Logmar introduced a new one about 2 years ago.
(So it was not even Kodak who started that.)
Concerning 35mm cameras, they had had been offered new until a few years ago by Arri. And Aaton is still offering a model!
There sure is no need for a new model.
Concerning the amateur market, there still is the model from Lomography.
I'd like to see a top performing slide film on the market,but at the price point it is at now, you won't see participation increase.
This is looking more and more like a knee jerk reaction to a fad in retro culture that could end in disaster when the neophytes can't find skilled repairmen to get their old clunkers working.
There are no real secrets in repairing cameras, one can read Ed Romney and other books, along with the huge information out there on the inner working of many cameras, and learn. 10 years ago I wouldn't have dared to repair a camera, but at the end I tried and i've repaired a few. Many cameras, no matter the brand, are similar if they are of a similar type (i.e. focal plane shutter SLR).
Many cameras thought as "non working" only need to be un-jammed and then given a bit of a lubrication job to be working again. Bad electronics are usually due to simple things such as corrosion, thus no special spares needed.
As pointed out, due to the triumph of digital photography there is a massive overflow of cameras out there, including ones in great shape, so i don't see how this could be a problem.
Some people aren't using what is on the market, they stopped using film when 64 speed Kodachrome was dropped.Kodak is not getting them back.Hardcore Kodachrome users never used Eektachrome or Fuji.
Have you ever thought of the costs involved with cine 35mm?
Anything fairly beyond the concept of that Lomography Lomokino will be beyond the means of an amateur.
Even S-8 is expensive to a point that it is prohibitive.
We have a thread how often we come across someone using a analogue still-camera. I assume we can save such effort for cine-cameras.
You know why hobbies such as model trains are dying? because it takes mechanical aptitude and motor skills, much the same as repairing cameras.
Lots of super8 shooters were very disappointed when Kodachrome 40 was dropped, my question was Why kodachrome 64 was not used for cine use instead? Does anybody know?
I would expect any return of kodachrome would be in a single film speed suitable for cine and camera use to save costs, so I expect would be in ISO 64 or ISO 100.
This would be a significant investment for Kodak to make,.
There is a difference between reformulating for reintroduction and re-engineering from scratch to prepare a new film.
PE
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?