I understand that they have to slit to either 16mm or 35mm. (super 8 is slit from 16 after perforating) and the slit film is not stored, and goes directly to the perforating room.
Or if they refer you to any potential retail oriented sources.
Unfortunately, in Europe, everyone gives up immediately when they hear Ektachrome. Well, they sell super 8, even 16mm, but when they hear 35mm - immediately a polite refusal.
So there's no need for them to assign an entire master roll to either motion or still; they can confection a mixture of both from the same roll.
Seems like Kodak has been creating some barriers for this: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/kodak-no-longer-selling-e100d-directly-to-customers.209595/
Understood - but that may change as a result of the apparent change in policy of Eastman Kodak themselves.
Before people started re-purposing those 400 foot loads for still film, there wouldn't have been much of a market for for the retailers in "small" orders - 1 or 2 rolls.
Basically no-one uses 35mm film for home movies or high school movie projects.
In the early 2000, here in Germany Kodak Motion was never selling motion picture film to consumers, only film productions. If you were a hobby filmmaker you'd buy through resellers.
They had an office here in Berlin with 3-4 employees coordinating all the film stock for the different production, with a fridge with some rolls for emergency.
At that time, there were also three major labs for motion picture film processing with excellent quality control in Berlin, and a small one for Super8 and 16mm.
after the rise of digital filmmaking, the film market collapsed. the Berlin office closed down and there was a single Kodak employee for all film productions in Germany. At some point we had a small project we wanted to shoot in b/w and Kodak Germany didn't have 5 rolls of 5222 Double-X left in stock, so they had to order it from Kodak France.
(Ironically, the small Berlin Lab is the only one that survived in Germany and now also does all of the 35mm film work - Arri had a fantastic lab in Munich, which also closed).
so for all I know, Kodak selling single rolls of 35mm motion picture films to consumers directly was never a common thing and they must have been desperate if they've done it for a while.
I wonder what would happen if a company wanted to order 10 rolls of 100D for re-spooling. If Kodak motion turns that down, that would be a clear indication that they have some agreement with Kodak Alaris about not competing on the photo market.
There is no limit anywhere on WHO can buy
Well, it looks like this is changing now. New ownership of Alaris, a doubtful marketing strategy by Alaris, some management changes at Eastman, possibly some pressure from major parties that don't want their cine-film reselling business to be threatened by smaller parties...there's some interests at work between a few key players here. In the end, I doubt those interests really serve the manufacturer itself, Eastman. The way it looks to me, Eastman will have to make a strategic choice within the next few years and arguably, it would be wise if they chose to side with the end user, not their present business partners (which may not be as sustainable/enduring as they might argue).
Sky high prices with the monopolist "take or leave" attitude.
even though this Ektachrome film is a cinema stock film, I don't believe there will be any sales along those lines
It's an attitude that won't be sustainable in the long run for a number of reasons - one of them being that the likes of you and me will not put up with it and just go do something else. Shoot digital, B&W, do color gum printing etc. Alaris may feel they're a monopolist, but from a perspective of Porter's 5 forces model applied to our hobby situation, there are plenty of substitutes that we can have fun with.
Speaking for myself, this is one of the reasons I moved away from E6 years ago. I just can't be bothered with €1 per frame; I'd rather go and have fun with something else.
Ask @Henning Serger about the color film price policy; he has a pretty strong opinion about it and I'm not sure I can disagree with him, either...
IDK; some sources assert that Ektachrome is pretty darn big. To be honest, I can't really make sense of it, but "so they say..."
Ask @Henning Serger about the color film price policy; he has a pretty strong opinion about it and I'm not sure I can disagree with him, either...
Maybe I can publish the most important results here on photrio in the future, in a dedicated thread.
There's also negative color film as a competitor.
Since Alaris will get a larger market share, they could lower prices as they may make better deals with Eastman as they act better in concert now that Alaris is under new management.
Frankly, I think Kodak film prices have gone up so much becasue Eastman has been sticking Alaris with higher arbitrary prices and Alaris has been forced to pass them along.
What's still not clear to me is what the original bankruptcy rules require in the area of markups from Eastman? IS it limited? A formula? What's stopping them from charging Alaris whatever they want?
Has anyone heard anything about Vision 3 500T (5219) or Eastman XX (5222) be affected by this policy, or is it only Ektachrome 100D (5294)? I use the 500T, when I need to push a color negative film, and sometimes I like the look of Eastman XX, in-place of the modern emulsions.
Provia 100 is still around and a competitor to Ektachrome. SO prices have to stop somewhere. There's also negative color film as a competitor. There is competition.
Also, don't assume the price for Ektachrome will go up more now that Cine Ektachrome won;t be sold for use as still film. Since Alaris will get a larger market share, they could lower prices as they may make better deals with Eastman as they act better in concert now that Alaris is under new management. Frankly, I think Kodak film prices have gone up so much becasue Eastman has been sticking Alaris with higher arbitrary prices and Alaris has been forced to pass them along. What's still not clear to me is what the original bankruptcy rules require in the area of markups from Eastman? IS it limited? A formula? What's stopping them from charging Alaris whatever they want?
Unless of course it has nothing to do with Kodak Alaris at all, and is all about Eastman Kodak not wanting to have anything more to do with the costs and headaches involved in one-off single roll sales.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?