Kodak gets loan; Stock Triples in Value!

OP
OP

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I don't know what it means the CEO buying stocks five weeks before news was leaked,...

Kodak says it is part of his normal stock purchase plan. The truth will come out on this.


They will make Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API), so it could be hydroxychloroquine, but likely not the tablets.

Whether it works or not is between a patient and their doctor. Not Twitter, not Google, not YouTube, not Cf-ingNN, or FOX or anybody else.

I tried to stay neutral .
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The same could be said for either existing pharmaceutical firms or any synthesizing firm.

True, but most US firms depend on foreign sources because generic APIs are not very profitable. Kodak supposedly has a contract in hand, and the US government will back them as a means of achieving a national security priority.
 

wyofilm

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Messages
1,158
Location
Wyoming
Format
Multi Format
The same could be said for either existing pharmaceutical firms or any synthesizing firm.

I bet every chemical manufacturing firm in the US has been approached. Some will just get contract work. Some like Kodak will get infrastructure loans AND production contracts. All of this is in effort to bring back critical (thus strategic) industries back to the US. Even more so in the face of this pandemic.
 

wyofilm

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Messages
1,158
Location
Wyoming
Format
Multi Format
I hope it at least bailed out some Kodak retirees also. Too bad Ron could not be here to see this day.

Until Hollywood stops buying film because of this deal. The mean orange man had a hand in it after all.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,915
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The real challenge with any attempt to restore local production capacity is that for it to work there needs to be acceptance as well of purchasing at something higher than the lowest or "best" price.
If you leave it up to just the market, that won't work well.
So you need subsidies, and you risk running afoul of agreements like NAFTA or its Trump replacement, which prohibits government subsidies in return for granting unfettered access to other markets.
The US currently pays the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs - both proprietary and generic. Just think how high those prices are likely to get if you force purchasing from higher priced local manufacturers.
 
  • markjwyatt
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • MattKing
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • AgX
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • markjwyatt
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • cmacd123
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • richyd
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • markjwyatt
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • DBP
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • markjwyatt
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • MattKing
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • markjwyatt
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • Rick A
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • markjwyatt
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • cmacd123
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.

Nodda Duma

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
2,685
Location
Batesville, Arkansas
Format
Multi Format
I see Kodak *still* hasn’t learned its mismanagement lessons dating back to (at least) the 1980s.
 
  • Ian Grant
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.
  • George Mann
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic and responses.

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,978
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
This thread has required a lot of pruning. It would be good for Photrio to have a place in the open forums to discuss developments about Kodak without it veering off into politics, elections, and the current U.S. administration. Yes, I know it's hard, because everything is political, but for the sake of the forum we've long maintained a policy that those things--no matter how relevant they may be--are best discussed elsewhere, not on Photrio.

Please don't troll and by the same token don't feed the trolls. If you're thinking of posting something that mentions a politician or a person holding elective office, it's most likely off topic for Photrio.
 

wyofilm

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Messages
1,158
Location
Wyoming
Format
Multi Format
Kodak CEO bought 47,000 shares one day before the announcement. He's been a regular buyer, but his timing in this case was incredibly stupid.
The stock purchase might have been a scheduled purchase, but then one wonders about the announcement timing. We'll see.
 

GRHazelton

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
2,249
Location
Jonesboro, G
Format
Multi Format
As someone noted earlier, Kodak has had a specialty chemical division for .... decades! I remember seeing their ads in Scientific American when I was not yet a teenager, a long time ago.
 

Deleted member 88956

Have you seen how drugs are priced for US market? This is what needs to get fixed as pricing has nothing to do with production cost, but is directly linked to health care market, hospital stay costs etc. The only country in the world that gets this raw deal from drug makers. Same drug from same maker elsewhere sells for a lot less and this is openly discussed at press conferences.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,307
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format

It's a problem in many countries, here in the UK the NHS pays way more for some over the counter drugs compared to prices we pay in chemists and supermarkets. Of course there are other issues in a largely privatised market like the US there there's no co-ordinated approach.

What's missing from this thread is the details of the close links between Trump and Kodak from the day he took office and the Kodak CEO becoming one of his his economic advisers. From our point of view as photographers it's not ideal if it leads to instability.

Ian
 

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,907
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
I don't see how the deal itself could be unlawful, the big question here is whether or not the CEO is guilty of insider trading?
 

Rlibersky

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
931
Location
St Paul MN
Format
8x10 Format
Lucky me I shorted the stock when it went up so stupidly. Even if they get the loan does it warrant a 2500% jump? Probably not. If there was monkey business some heads will roll.
 
  • Deleted member 88956
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Take discussion of moderation policy and structure of the forum to “Feedback.” This thread is about
  • George Mann
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Take discussion of moderation policy and structure of the forum to “Feedback.” This thread is about
  • Kino
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Take discussion of moderation policy and structure of the forum to “Feedback.” This thread is about
  • removedacct1
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Take discussion of moderation policy and structure of the forum to “Feedback.” This thread is about

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,860
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
The tread didn't start out that way, but suddenly information emerged that was unavoidably political in nature. I do think enough initial cited information was given for any reader to do their own research.

I don't see how potential malfeasance in a potentially lucrative contract for Kodak suddenly loses its relevance when it's suddenly revealed to have political implications. It could have disastrous results for anyone who wants to continue to have Kodak products in their life.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,978
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format

The key is to keep it close to the original topic. If it’s about the administration and Kodak, that’s relevant and fair game, but if it’s about the administration and everything else, then take it elsewhere. Unfortunately, it usually takes only one or two posts to get from the former to the latter.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,130
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
As a photography forum I presume our main concern is the effect it will have on Kodak's continued ability to be a film company.

So if malfeasance is proved what is the likely outcome for Kodak in terms of its viability?. What are the likely consequences and does anyone have any idea backed by real knowledge

Does it make Kodak's future seriously more precarious or is there grounds for believing that little will change? In a nutshell should Kodak film and chemical users be concerned (a) that Kodak will make a smaller range of film and/or need to charge more for its film and chemicals sold under its name or (b) cease to exist as a film maker ?

Thanks

pentaxuser
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…