Kodak ektalure advice,info.

A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 61
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 1
  • 59
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 61
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 2
  • 64
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 119

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,791
Messages
2,780,897
Members
99,705
Latest member
Hey_You
Recent bookmarks
0

Alan W

Member
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
551
Location
Tennessee
Format
Medium Format
Hello all,I just got out of my darkroom where I test printed some 8x10 and 11x14 ektalure paper.This stuff has been freezer kept for at least 10 years so I thought I'd test it out.The negative I printed from is sharp frrom corner to corner and front to back,but the print isn't-it's reasonably sharp in the centre and a touch fuzzy toward the corners.I then printed some ilford MG,new, and the print was as good as the negative.My question is this-Is ektalure supposed to look like this?I've been reading a little recently about Wolfgang Moersch and it seems as if this was one of his favourite papers for lith printing,I suppose the slight "fuzziness" would look alright lith printed and I'll try this over the weekend,any advice,suggestions,comments,thanks to all.
 

pgomena

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
1,391
Location
Portland, Or
Sounds to me as though the paper is not sitting flat in your print easel. 10 years in the freezer might make it a bit curlier than the new MG. Ektalure is a bit thicker than MG, too, so that might exacerbate the curl.

Peter Gomena
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom