Kodacolor-X (cx 620) exp 1968

CK341

A
CK341

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

A
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
  • 40
Windfall 1.jpeg

A
Windfall 1.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 2
  • 0
  • 37
Windfall 2.jpeg

A
Windfall 2.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 1
  • 0
  • 34
Marsh, Oak Leaves.jpeg

A
Marsh, Oak Leaves.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
  • 35

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,610
Messages
2,761,928
Members
99,416
Latest member
TomYC
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
892
Location
New Jersey
Format
Large Format
I bought a $1.99 Ansco ReadyFlash that came with an unopened roll of this film and wondered what I can generally expect from this and if my normal color lab can handle it. Since it's Saturday I can't call the lab so I'm asking you all :smile:

I loaded it in the camera and will be shooting on sunny days or if I can find some bulbs for the flash. It's been snowing for the past two days so I may have to wait awhile.

Thanks,

Alan.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,018
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I think Kodacolour-X was C-22 process, but that is based on memory only.
 

greypilgrim

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
6
Format
Multi Format
MattKing said:
I think Kodacolour-X was C-22 process, but that is based on memory only.

According to Rocky Mountain Film you are right that it is C22. And if RMF still develops it, I would bet that there might be a couple of other labs that do, too.

Doug
 

Brac

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
632
Location
UK
Format
35mm
It will be very expensive to process as its the old C22 process. As the film is almost 40 years old the results are likely to be poor with colours off balance and a high base fog level. There could also be mottling & other defects if its been stored in poor conditions - quite a strong possibility with such an old film. Personally I wouldn't bother. I have heard you can process it to a black & white negative but I've got no details.
 
OP
OP
MenacingTourist
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
892
Location
New Jersey
Format
Large Format
So basically it has to be processed with C-22 and 75 degrees rather than with C-41 and 100 degrees which would melt off all the emulsion?

I did some searching and found out about RMF. The $30 to process is a bit steep but I guess it could be interesting and I only have one roll. Too bad I can't put it in my Diana :smile:
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
MenacingTourist said:
So basically it has to be processed with C-22 and 75 degrees rather than with C-41 and 100 degrees which would melt off all the emulsion?

I did some searching and found out about RMF. The $30 to process is a bit steep but I guess it could be interesting and I only have one roll. Too bad I can't put it in my Diana :smile:
Throw the fim away! I can tell you from experience that C-22 process films had a terribly poor shelf life. Save your money.

Don Bryant
 

battra92

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2005
Messages
217
Format
Medium Format
donbga said:
Throw the fim away! I can tell you from experience that C-22 process films had a terribly poor shelf life. Save your money.

Don Bryant

No no! Save it as a collector's item. If it was exposed, I'd say send it to a guy at Photo.net in the classic cameras forum who can develop c-22 as B&W.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom