The owner of Kodacolor trademark is Eastman Kodak. Clearly, Kodak Alaris is out of this.
View attachment 408491
You were right on the money!What did I say?
Am I wrong with the below?
Kodacolor 100 = Gold 100
Kodacolor 200 = Gold 200
I don't think anyone who is in a position to confirm, will do so.Am I wrong with the below?
Kodacolor 100 = Gold 100
Kodacolor 200 = Gold 200
Small-scale respooling is virtually impossible to restrict.it doesn't seem like this is being enforced all that strictly
I think this should also be the final nail in the coffin for the argument that Eastman putting the kibosh on motion picture film sales to stills photographers, was all due to Alaris.
Clearly, if Alaris had enough sway to make EK enforce stricter terms on motion picture film sales, they would have never let Eastman do this.
Respoolers being too much of a drain to EK and their then more limited production capacity, while presumably being seen as "leeches" by EK themselves, seems good enough of a reason for them to put a stop to it, even if individual photographers got caught in the crossfire.
And even then, it doesn't seem like this is being enforced all that strictly as new respoolers still pop up, like Filmriss just recently.
Alaris was sold a little while ago and maybe the new owners don't care much anymore.
Maybe Pro Image 100 and Color Plus 200
Has anyone actually seen the box?
For all we know, EK has licensed this, or bought back rights, from KA.
The fine print on the back of the box would tell us a lot.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?