Back in the days when I developed slide-tape training programs (if you don't know what I'm talking about you are probably under 40) .
Back in the days when I developed slide-tape training programs (if you don't know what I'm talking about you are probably under 40) we found Kodachrome to be more durable in terms of colorfastness under frequently used and prolonged projection situations. But sometimes we would just use Ektachrome slides because they were cheaper to repro in quantity; we'd just replace the slides more often.
the other day I doug out some of my mother's slides from the 1950's - Kodachrome.
[...]
It is actually very strange seeing images from this period that look "modern" in terms of colour, grain and general quality.
[...]
I wonder how well C-41 negatives will hold up? Anyone know? [I assume not very well]
I have color negatives from the 50s and 60s that are holding up quite well. I also have C41 negatives from the 70s and 80s that are doing well also. I think that my negatives from that era are holding up better than my slides, but the slides are E1, E2, E3 and E4. I think that the E6 are doing well, but are too new to really judge.
PE
PE:
Just a curiousity question here.
When was K12 replaced with K14, and when was E4 replaced with E6.
If anyone else has the dates, please feel free to chime in.
Matt
I cannot say anything regarding Elite Chrome Extra Color I. I have not tried it.
Mannes and Godowsky were NYC musicians that were working on Kodachrome and attracted the attention of George Eastman. They moved to Rochester and completed the development.
This is a true story.
PE
Was Mannes the same one who started the Mannes School of Music in NYC? Sounds logical....
Kodachrome dyes were at the leading edge of technology when the current process was developed in the 70s. Since then, no new advances have been made, but E6 film technology has advanced considerably and so has dye stability.
Why was no effort made to improve the Kodachrome products?
Why was no effort made to improve the Kodachrome products?
I'm not a darkroom guru by any means, but I found this item to be very interesting as it explains quite a bit of how Kodachrome actually works, and the steps required to process it. It's out of a manual set for the K-Lab Kodachrome processing machine.
http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/service/Zmanuals/z50_03.pdf
The thing I found interesting is that I have always been told that actual dyes were physically added during processing (kind of like pouring Rit into a washing machine) and this document explains that the dyes are actually a byproduct of the oxidized developers and formed during processing, although one at a time, not all at once as with the Ektachrome type films.
Although I "cringe" to say it - and checked other sources too - this Wikepedia post does seem to explain it all...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_Mannes
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?