Matthew Gorringe
Member
It always seems to me that "artists" make do with the materials at hand. "Dilettantes" tend to blame their tools.
As someone said somewhere sometime ago, "Adapt or Die!"![]()
Hmmm, up to a point. These particular products aren't critical to me but I can think of one other paper that would mean a major problem if it was to be discontinued.
I can certainly sympathise with people you describe as "dilettantes"; it can be very difficult to adapt. I remember people who are 100% artists (and whose interest is demonstarbly more than superficial) who felt the need to max out credit cards and buy freezers full of AZO and Polycontrast when they were discontinued. Polycontrast wasn't even a unique category, there's heaps of VC FB papers out there. If you can't spend $20,000 or more on buying in a stock to last for some years then you have to adapt, but it doesn't mean your work will be as good and some artists recognise this.
Photographic paper isn't only a tool it is the final product as well. The paper defines certains things about the finished print.
Having said all that there's no sense in blaming Harman for its decisions. It's fantastic that Simon bothers to come here and inform this community about it as one of the company's first public announcements. I won't be as kind if Harman ever discontinues Galerie!
Last edited by a moderator: