Somewhere in the myriad of internet locations that Harman shares things, there is or was information about how their two film product lines compare.
And included in that is a reference to the fact that the difference in the level of anti-halation incorporated in the films helps contribute to being able to sell the Kentmere products at a reduced cost to customers like the educational markets.
It isn't that there is no anti-halation. It is that the anti-halation is less.
Hello Matt,
I can confirm that.
When I first used the Kentmere films the less effective (worse) anti-halation capabilities compared to the in that regard excellent Ilford films was one of the first differences and characteristics I realized comparing the films.
The difference was obvious and clearly visible in the final results.
During our amazing factory tour in Mobberley we talked about these differences as well and I got my test results confirmed.
To be able to offer both Kentmere films at significantly lower price some cost reductions in the production process had to be made. Therefore also the quality compromise in anti-halation effectiveness.
Nevertheless the Kentmeres offer very good value, especially for beginners and photographers on a very tight budget.
I am using them mainly for applications in my photo test lab, when I need many films for certain camera and lens tests, and when their disadvantages are irrelevant and don't play a role.
That Harman technology / Ilford Photo is now offering both films in 120 format as well is an excellent decision.
When I've read it I thought "finally".......
.
Best regards,
Henning
I would rather not have to deal with it. But you are free to swim in it if you choose.
www.ilfordphoto.com
