KEH ratings!

philosli

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
57
Location
US
Format
Multi Format
I read everyone's praising of KEH's service and their "conservative" ratings. However, my experience with them is mixed. I would say their customer service is top notch, and their generous return policy and 6-month warranty really puts customers' minds in peace.

I can say so because I have went through all of them. In the past year I bought 2 cameras and 1 lens from them, and in all 3 transactions I needed to return or get the item repaired. The most recent is a bargain-grade camera body first released 30 years ago. But it's really in bargain grade: body smells strangely, the outer shell covering (some kind of plastic) is whitened. I thought as long as it works it should be fine. But the film advance lever gave out at the end of the very first roll. So I have no choice but to return it.

The lens I bought is in excellent grade. I got it at a very good price because it has an engraving. That's fine. But there is some linkage problem so the camera cannot read the correct aperture (a well-known issue in Contax SRL system). I returned it for repair. Two weeks passed by they couldn't fix it. So I decided to live with the problem asked them to send the lens back. At the last month of the 6-month warranty period the lens aperture stopped closing down. So I sent it back for repair and thought I was lucky that the problem showed up before the end of the warranty. Maybe because of the earlier issue, they fixed it in two days and I got the lens back in a week.

The first camera body I bought from them went through 3 iterations. In the first one I must admit I was too picky. The second body was faulty. The 3rd time was a charm. The body was in EX grade, though.
 

elekm

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
2,055
Location
New Jersey (
Format
35mm RF
The plastic-bodied SLRs from the 1980s and 1990s are "dime a dozen," so to speak. They are viewed as mass produced cameras and quickly replaceable and don't carry the same perceived value as the so-called classics.

You'll know why you paid so little when you try to sell one. And I'm sure KEH is swimming in these models, which is why they unload them so cheaply.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,175
Location
Milton, DE USA
Format
Analog
What amazes me with KEH is not what they charge for their stock, but rather what they pay you for your gear. I have quoted more than a little bit over the years and I realize that they have overhead and need to profit and the electronics devalue over time. Hence their ow offerings by and large.

But how can so many people be so desperate to move a camera that they just fire it off for so little in return.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,871
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Estates and (in the past) stores who cease selling used inventories.
 

Peter Simpson

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2010
Messages
221
Location
Outside Bost
Format
35mm

The ratings seem mostly cosmetic. I don't think they do a lot of functional testing. So I'd buy BGN, I think the odds of getting a dud would be about the same. Price difference on a flash between BGN and EX shouldn't be that much. I definitely would buy EX instead of EX+, though.
 

John_Nikon_F

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
1,963
Location
Duvall, WA,
Format
Multi Format

You'll be pleasantly surprised with the manual 35/2 lenses. They're better than the AF-D version. Pretty much any of them from the original Nikkor-O through the AIS version will beat the AF and AF-D versions.

Re: where KEH's inventory comes from, there are estate sales, shops that have given up on used inventory, private sellers, and they also have buyers who hit local camera shops every 60 days to purchase inventory that has been sitting around but that is of interest to their buyers. With the local shops here in the Seattle area, you can usually tell when Justin from KEH has come through. The Nikon and Canon cases have about 1/3 the inventory of what they had earlier.

-J
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,644
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
You'll be pleasantly surprised with the manual 35/2 lenses. They're better than the AF-D version. Pretty much any of them from the original Nikkor-O through the AIS version will beat the AF and AF-D versions.

-J

that's nt my experience. my 24,35,50AFDs are just as god as their AIS siblings frm what I can tell.
 

John_Nikon_F

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
1,963
Location
Duvall, WA,
Format
Multi Format
that's nt my experience. my 24,35,50AFDs are just as god as their AIS siblings frm what I can tell.

The 24 and 50 I'd expect to have them perform the same as the AIS versions, since they are basically the same lenses. The 35, however, is a different design optically, having six elements in five groups, instead of eight elements in six groups. Center sharpness is fine, but the edges suffer some loss on the 35/2 AF (and AF-D).

-J
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…