Keeping the Big Guns Steady

Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 2
  • 3
  • 20
Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 1
  • 79
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 67
High st

A
High st

  • 10
  • 0
  • 96

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,231
Messages
2,788,216
Members
99,836
Latest member
Candler_Park
Recent bookmarks
0

BradleyK

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
946
Location
Burnaby, BC
Format
Multi Format
An avid outdoors person and (surprise) landscape photographer, I often times find myself grabbing shots of wildlife when out trekking around. Needless to say, when doing so, the long glass (400mm and 600mm typically) comes into play. While I have experimented with various tripods to use with longer glass, I still find myself, from time-to-time, battling the wind; keeping the long glass steady - and the pictures sharp - especially in conditions of diminishing light, can be a bit of an ordeal. Camera-wise, I will often switch to an F2 or F3 so I can lock up the mirror and use a cable release; nonetheless, bracketing, and hoping for a moment's stillness, is often the only way to be sure of getting a usable image or two out of the effort. So, a question, any thoughts on steadying the rig to ensure a high(er) percentage of success. BTW: I use the old trick of suspending the camera bag under the tripod and I often use a Manfrotto )56 tripod...
 
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
1
Format
Medium Format
I would attach a monopod under the camera and stake the monopod into the ground. Or use another tripod under the camera using 2 of the legs.

An avid outdoors person and (surprise) landscape photographer, I often times find myself grabbing shots of wildlife when out trekking around. Needless to say, when doing so, the long glass (400mm and 600mm typically) comes into play. While I have experimented with various tripods to use with longer glass, I still find myself, from time-to-time, battling the wind; keeping the long glass steady - and the pictures sharp - especially in conditions of diminishing light, can be a bit of an ordeal. Camera-wise, I will often switch to an F2 or F3 so I can lock up the mirror and use a cable release; nonetheless, bracketing, and hoping for a moment's stillness, is often the only way to be sure of getting a usable image or two out of the effort. So, a question, any thoughts on steadying the rig to ensure a high(er) percentage of success. BTW: I use the old trick of suspending the camera bag under the tripod and I often use a Manfrotto )56 tripod...
 

elekm

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
2,055
Location
New Jersey (
Format
35mm RF
Just like hunters will use trees to steady their rifles, I probably would use the "V" of a tree trunk or a sturdy branch to steady the barrel of a long lens while the camera is on a monopod or tripod. You could even bring along a small beanbag or cloth to keep the lens clean.
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,652
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
I don't know if your long lenses have a tripod bracket. I use medium format and have a 350mm lens that is one heavy lens and it doesn't have a tripod socket so when using it under windy conditions or coupled with a 2x it can be an issue even with my heavy tripod. I solved the problem by having a machine shop make me a removable fitting that attaches to a tripod quick-connect and around the lens barrel. It is made out of aluminum and was inexpensive. It attaches so that the weight is evenly distributed over the center of the tripod.

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/
 

2gman

Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
3
Format
35mm
I am both a hunter and photographer. Here is what has worked for me. My 20-200 zoom doesn't have a teipod bracket so I use what hunters call shooting sticks. These are two sticks joined to form a X. You could rest your long lenses in the X to steady them. When not using the sticks for this purpose they make geart walking sticks. You can find these sticks at almost any outdoor equipment store that sells hunting gear or just look on line and then build your own.
 

Jim Taylor

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
151
Location
West Yorkshire, UK
Format
Medium Format
I've had the same issue, the tripod stays stock still (with the camera bag suspended below it), but I was getting a small amount of play around the QR plate.

I solved this problem by:

You could even bring along a small beanbag.

and sitting it on top of the rig to push it down firmly into the QR mount.

HTH.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
5,462
Location
.
Format
Digital
You need two firmly-set tripods with lenses that long, one of which is attached to the collar of the lens, another attached to either the base of the camera or resting in a 'V'-shaped cradle at the front of the lens. Or get down on the ground with the camera on the ground and the lens supported by one or two polystyrene bean bags.

Attaching a weight to the center column can introduce twisting with even the slightest breeze.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
167
Location
Carolina Bea
Format
35mm
Back in the 60's and 70's I mounted a 600mm lens to a slr and mounted both to an old rifle stock, it was surpisingly steady and quick to aim. I don't know the availability or ease of purchase of one today, it's a different world out there
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,880
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
If I'm not mistaken Zeiss Ikon built a rifle stock mount for their Contax cameras and lenses that were used by sports photographers at the 1936 Summer Olympics. You can probably still find something similar but I would personally avoid them.

I used to have a 3rd party tripod mount that would attach to your zoom lens. Can't remember the brand but it was a handy little gadget.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Suggestions:
Use a tripod or set the camera down
Use a faster shutter speed
If hand holding the camera do not breath and stop your heart from beating​
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,594
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Additional suggestions:
Work out more
Cut back on caffeinated beverages or alcohol
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I'm assuming you're already using a tripod. If not, that's the first step. Second, if you already are using a tripod, try a gimbal head for your long lens - the camera/lens combo will mount to the gimbal head via the lens' tripod mounting block, and the whole assembly will be mounted at more or less the balance point, instead of at one extreme, which will tend to induce vibration and motion.
 

LiamG

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
165
Location
Western Oregon
Format
Medium Format
I would attach a monopod under the camera and stake the monopod into the ground. Or use another tripod under the camera using 2 of the legs.
That's what I would advise as well. I think there are some commercial products (like the manfrotto 359 long lens support) that brace the camera against the legs of the tripod itself.
 

mopar_guy

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
1,176
Location
Washington,
Format
Multi Format
I'm assuming you're already using a tripod. If not, that's the first step. Second, if you already are using a tripod, try a gimbal head for your long lens - the camera/lens combo will mount to the gimbal head via the lens' tripod mounting block, and the whole assembly will be mounted at more or less the balance point, instead of at one extreme, which will tend to induce vibration and motion.

Actually, the theory that the exact balance point will allow vibrations to resonate for a longer period, so most long lenses are designed with the tripod mount slightly in front of or behind the balance point.

More information here:

http://www.tripodhead.com/

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/Wimberley-Tripod-Head-II-Review.aspx
 
OP
OP

BradleyK

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
946
Location
Burnaby, BC
Format
Multi Format
Additional suggestions:
Work out more
Cut back on caffeinated beverages or alcohol

A six-times weekly workout is the norm for me and has been for almost two decades (I am both a 24 Hour of Adrenalin ((solo)) alumnus as well as a ((solo)) Death Race alumnus). Cutting back on coffee is a no-go; my typical work days (5X12 hours with an additional 8 hour day often thrown in for "good measure" - perhaps why I am so selfish/short tempered when it comes to my leisure?) require I stay jacked and focussed. As for alcohol? I doubt I spend more than $200.00 a year on the stuff (morning comes too early!). I think, Brian, the solution to the unsteady lens issue is to be remedied in the choice/modification/customization od equipment... :D
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,594
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
A six-times weekly workout is the norm for me and has been for almost two decades (I am both a 24 Hour of Adrenalin ((solo)) alumnus as well as a ((solo)) Death Race alumnus). Cutting back on coffee is a no-go; my typical work days (5X12 hours with an additional 8 hour day often thrown in for "good measure" - perhaps why I am so selfish/short tempered when it comes to my leisure?) require I stay jacked and focussed. As for alcohol? I doubt I spend more than $200.00 a year on the stuff (morning comes too early!). I think, Brian, the solution to the unsteady lens issue is to be remedied in the choice/modification/customization od equipment... :D

I stand corrected and should have prefaced my comment with, "When I'm feeling unsteady holding a camera I ought to consider...". :laugh:

But seriously, I have been an avid user of monopod or tripod on all cameras for many years. They help a lot.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom