• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Kata HB 207

St Ives - UK

A
St Ives - UK

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Across the Liffey

H
Across the Liffey

  • Tel
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1
  • 2
  • 22

Forum statistics

Threads
202,436
Messages
2,840,816
Members
101,332
Latest member
Paul William
Recent bookmarks
0

Fixer

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
17
Format
35mm
Has anyone used the above as a bag for their LF setups? I am considering it, the other choice is the Lowepro Computrekker AW or Plus AW.
 
Has anyone used the above as a bag for their LF setups? I am considering it, the other choice is the Lowepro Computrekker AW or Plus AW.

Not me! No way I'd try to drag that sort of thing up a mountain.

My current LF (8x10) bag:

Dead Link Removed

Gregory Baltoro 70

Volume 70 liters

Weight empty 2.52 kg

Can comfortably carry up to 25 kg
 
Not going to climb any mountains. It just for moving the camera around. Am using a Magmum AW now and its killing it. Mines a 4 X 5 Omegaview 45F. I have managed to pack it down into its various components. But would like a comfy pack to lug it along. What don't you like abt the Kata or the Lowepro? Is it the Ergonomics?
 
I have a Kata Panda 401 which I use for LF, mostly 4x5. It is sturdy, a good size, well made, and conveniently divided into two compartments. There is a little flap thing which holds my camera in the lower section, with open space on the bottom and sides, which helps to protect from impact. Very happy with the bag.

I have my 8x10 in a Kelty Redwing backpack, which is good, but doesn't provide the kind of protection that I get from the Kata.
 
Not going to climb any mountains. It just for moving the camera around. Am using a Magmum AW now and its killing it. Mines a 4 X 5 Omegaview 45F. I have managed to pack it down into its various components. But would like a comfy pack to lug it along. What don't you like abt the Kata or the Lowepro? Is it the Ergonomics?

Yes, the ergonomics. I do go up and down mountains with my LF cameras.
 
I have an HB-207 which I have loaded down with my Hasselblad setup and I do like it. It is not as comfortable as my Photobackpacker Kelty pack which carries my Sinar F 4x5, nor as comfortable as an Expedition 7 bag I have. The padding on the shoulder harness could be better and the waist belt is not designed for skinny people!! And it does not carry a tripod well.
I like it because of the configuration and protection I can get with it and the yellow makes it easy to see things. It looks huge on your back though...kind of like a turtle shell!!

I think there would be better and cheaper options for carrying your Omega. For example the Kelty packs that Bruce sells at Photobackpacker.com are very nice and I think the price is right.
 
What abt the computrekker AW plus? The Kata and Lowepro are the option i have access to.. Getting the kelty or the photobackpackers will be too expensive.
 
I have no experience with the Computrekker AW. Lowepro packs have a very good reputation.
If you have access to them before you buy then I would take your gear and see which one would fit it best and feel the most comfortable.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom