Well, it's better than tv...
Well, it's better than tv...This thread is more stupid than the deleted thread. What a waste of brain cells. oh, the humanity...
Back on topic: Anyone saw the Kodachrome movie on Netflix? I have a technical question about the Kodachrome photos displayed during the end credits. What is the trick used to make those Kodachrome look so amazing? I mean the contrast and colors are out of this world. Anyone knows?
It seems that some consider this thread "proof" that Kr is still viable and must be brought back. Nutty.That was not the original topic. It is about the marketplace not supporting the return of Kodachrome, not a discussion of the characteristics or use of the film.
That was not the original topic. It is about the marketplace not supporting the return of Kodachrome, not a discussion of the characteristics or use of the film.
It seems that some consider this thread "proof" that Kr is still viable and must be brought back. Nutty.
It seems that some consider this thread "proof" that Kr is still viable and must be brought back. Nutty.
At least the deleted thread was funny and did not have anything about Kodachrome!
It seems the deleted thread would still be around if it hadn't been designated as deleted. Or was it? What was the original post in that thread?
It seems the deleted thread would still be around if it hadn't been designated as deleted. Or was it? What was the original post in that thread?
When did that thread exist and how long was it?
Maybe we should have an undeleted thread instead of this one because it seems easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is to bring back Kodachrome.
Yes it’s THEIR fawlt... “those nutters”.I'm sorry, but you guys let the deleted thread be deleted!
PE
Yeah - PE just mentioned it : "At least it is not about Kodakchrome".....So let me first state in short the following.I realy don't like to come off topic in that way some others did it here. I can understand if some have a total different look to issues about Kodakchrome - but who can say what will happen in the future or who is right and who isn't. So why is the culture of argumentation gone ? To state off topics is no serious way.
Yes I understand. ..I havn't seen the full movie I remember a trailer of this film last year. I will go first to Netflix and come back later.Hi trendland. Thanks for putting back some common sense to this thead where it seems many Kodachrome bashing posters take pretext of past market states to obliterate any possibility of future evolution of said market which may hint to a return of Kodachrome ever. They do have the right to dislike Kodachrome, they do have the right to prefer black and white or print film, but disqualifying any discussion about the potential of any interest in Kodachrome today or in the future by means of making fun of those who express an interest for Kodachrome is just not part of what a fair argumentation should be.
By the way I was indeed refering to that movie directed by Marc Raso. I know it was shot on Kodak Vision 3 35mm film then digitally timed and graded. I was asking about the look of the Steve McCurry Kodachrome photos displayed during the end credits.
Hi trendland. Thanks for putting back some common sense to this thead where it seems many Kodachrome bashing posters take pretext of past market states to obliterate any possibility of future evolution of said market which may hint to a return of Kodachrome ever. They do have the right to dislike Kodachrome, they do have the right to prefer black and white or print film, but disqualifying any discussion about the potential of any interest in Kodachrome today or in the future by means of making fun of those who express an interest for Kodachrome is just not part of what a fair argumentation should be.
There are few Kodachrome bashers. That line of argument is disingenuous and a red herring. Most photographers think Kodachome was an excellent transparency film, if not the best ever made. The argument centers on whether Kodachrome is now commercially viable. Apparently, Kodak thinks it is not commercially viable. They discontinued its manufacture in 2009 and its processing in 2010 after decades of declining sales. There is no sign of its revival, however much its proponents may wish it. Kodak can't even get the new Ektachrome out the door. And there are serious concerns over the future of Velvia and Provia. Transparencies are all but dead. Shoot transparency film while you can.Thanks for putting back some common sense to this thead where it seems many Kodachrome bashing posters take pretext of past market states to obliterate any possibility of future evolution of said market which may hint to a return of Kodachrome ever. They do have the right to dislike Kodachrome, they do have the right to prefer black and white or print film, but disqualifying any discussion about the potential of any interest in Kodachrome today or in the future by means of making fun of those who express an interest for Kodachrome is just not part of what a fair argumentation should be.
Drummer here. You triggered me.and made Ringo Starr one of the best drummers of all time.
Sorry, it is illogical to ask for proof of a potential and unknow quantity. I never pretended the market is without a doubt there waiting impatiently for a return of Kodachrome. On the other hand one cannot prove there is not and will never be any market again for Kodachrome. Just because no one knows what the future holds. Simple logic here.You speak of fair argumentation, but you still haven't shown us any good evidence of why there is a market for Kodachrome today or in the future. Have you sent that letter to Kodak yet? Show us something instead of baseless arguing with those with good evidence that it won't return.
I'm thinking of doing one of two things; which would be best?
1. Putting this inane thread on "ignore"
or
2. Putting all participants on this inane thread on ignore.
Please advise me...
I'm thinking of doing one of two things; which would be best?
1. Putting this inane thread on "ignore"
or
2. Putting all participants on this inane thread on ignore.
Please advise me...
Coin toss.I'm thinking of doing one of two things; which would be best?
1. Putting this inane thread on "ignore"
or
2. Putting all participants on this inane thread on ignore.
Please advise me...
Sorry, it is illogical to ask for proof of a potential and unknow quantity. I never pretended the market is without a doubt there waiting impatiently for a return of Kodachrome. On the other hand one cannot prove there is not and will never be any market again for Kodachrome. Just because no one knows what the future holds. Simple logic here.
That would be a very thorough approach.Do both!
PE
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?