Fin
Member
So, I very recently took delivery of a 1969 Kiev 4 (iii), fully working and allegedly serviced with a Jupiter 8. An initial roll of FP4 confirms that it's all working very well, including the lightmeter, which is really good as it cost £30 (GBP) plus another £15 for shipping from the Ukraine. Happy with that! 
I also bought a 71 Jupiter 12 from a UK seller who mistakenly bought the wrong mount lens for his/her camera. This came with the original case and rear lens cover, the rear lens is pretty much faultless and the helicoid seems good. Annoyingly though, it has what looks like balsam separation marks visible from the front of the lens.
Questions:
Has anyone ever repaired one of these lenses?
Are both doublets actually bonded with balsam or something else like epoxy?
What would be the best way of heating the offending doublet to re-flow the balsam/glue/whatever is in there and separating?
This Jupiter 12 only cost me £20, so I have little to loose if it all goes the way of the pear. Any suggestions would be great!
TIA!

I also bought a 71 Jupiter 12 from a UK seller who mistakenly bought the wrong mount lens for his/her camera. This came with the original case and rear lens cover, the rear lens is pretty much faultless and the helicoid seems good. Annoyingly though, it has what looks like balsam separation marks visible from the front of the lens.
Questions:
Has anyone ever repaired one of these lenses?
Are both doublets actually bonded with balsam or something else like epoxy?
What would be the best way of heating the offending doublet to re-flow the balsam/glue/whatever is in there and separating?
This Jupiter 12 only cost me £20, so I have little to loose if it all goes the way of the pear. Any suggestions would be great!
TIA!