JOBO Expert vs Standard Drums

DanielStone

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
3,114
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
hey all,

i've noticed that lately when processing 4x5 color and b/w negs, i have been getting uneven development along the edge rebates. not all the time, but enough to make me mad.

what is the hype regarding the expert tanks? are they THAT much better? how do they differ than the standard 2509 reels and tanks?

i'm using a cpp2 with lift, and my temp control is under control, but this really pisses me off. especially when its on a neg i really want.

any help would be appreciated. maybe my technique is what's wrong.

i'm using d76 1:1 with TMY-2 in 4x5 and 120. also acros 100 in 120.

every 1 1/2 minutes or so, i gently lift the rails with the tank still rotating( to move the chemistry from side to side).


anyone have any ideas?



p.s. are the expert drums worth the price? i want to be able to process e-6 as well (kodak 6 bath), but I don't want this to happen on my 4x5 and 8x10 chromes =(. or any of my film...
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
Why are you lifting the tank? The tank spinning is supposed to move the developer. If you're using enough in a level setup the film will be well covered.

The experts are a totally different setup. Think more like a revolver . The one I've got is only used for larger film so I can't comment on 4x5. The 2509N has always worked fine for me with 4x5. Fingers crossed.
 

snallan

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
518
Location
Cambridge, U
Format
Multi Format
Hi Daniel,

Do you have the 2509, or the 2509n reels? The 2509n reels come with a set of black baffles that fit over the end of the sheets of film, and is supposed to improve consistency.

If you have the original 2509 reels, Jobo have recommended that no more than four sheets of film are processed in any run, leaving the central slot on each side empty.

I agree with Nick, there should be no need to rock the drum during processing, the reversing of directions every couple of rotations helps to break up any standing flow patterns.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,482
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
I had similar problems with my CPE until I discovered Jobo's recommendation to use it's higher speed.
Unlike the CPP, the CPE only has two speed choices.
 

richard littlewood

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
146
Location
Pennines
Format
4x5 Format
Those 2509 reels. I think they have 3 issues. 1. The film edges are away from the spiral edges in some places, but touching in others, and this varies from slot to slot. 2. Even though there are 6 slots, it seems for better, even deving, using only 4 is the way to go. 3. I have doubts as to the beneficial effects of the black plasitc flaps, so much so that I dont use them any more. My solution to the first problem was to epoxy very small plastic 'pips' around the spiral slots (about 3 per side) to keep the film edges away from the spiral edges on the emulsion side. I used to be driven mad by odd density weirdness down the long edges, but not any more. Loading is also no trickier. I accept problem 2 and go with 4 sheets only.
The 2509 reels are not perfect, but with a bit of faffing around they can perform really well, so much so that any deving nasties can seem insignificant.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I use expert drums, as they avoid all the above problems with the 2509 reels, and the 3010 drum can do 10 sheets of 4x5 at a time to boot. The tubes in the expert drums are smooth the whole way around, with a minor ridge providing the separation between the two sheets of 4x5. Although they're expensive, which is cheaper, an expert drum or trying to re-shoot multiple scenes to replace images affected by uneven development? The cost-benefit quickly weighs in on the side of the expert drum.
 

Bruce Watson

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
497
Location
Central NC
Format
4x5 Format

I'm processing 5x4 TMY-2 (and before that Tri-X) using a 3010 tank on a CPP-2. All I can tell you is that I've put over a thousand sheets through this rig without ever having the problem you describe. I get perfectly even development corner to corner, every time. I couldn't ask for better.

You shouldn't have to do anything with a CPP-2 beyond let it reverse direction automatically. Lifting the tank off the rails is probably a bad idea and will accomplish very little if the tank itself is level.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,632
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Different films and developers respond differently to rotary agitation. I'd try some different developers (like T-max developer) and see if that gives a more even edge.
 
OP
OP

DanielStone

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
3,114
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
ic-racer said:
Different films and developers respond differently to rotary agitation. I'd try some different developers (like T-max developer) and see if that gives a more even edge.
Click to expand...



doesn't Kodak reccomend that the TMAX developer not be used in rotary processors? please correct me if I'm misquoting.

thanks everyone for the help, if anyone else has some advice, please say so.

the CPP2 i'm using is level, and i'm using the 2509n reels(black baffle inserts). the reels aren't mine (local photo center adult ed). the same with the cpp2. i'm the only one using it since everyone pretty much there is shooting d1git@l. many people give me weird looks as to why i'm standing at a sink for hours upon end, but when they see the contact sheets, they start to understand
 

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
2,761
Location
Denton, TX
Format
Multi Format
DanielStone said:
doesn't Kodak reccomend that the TMAX developer not be used in rotary processors? please correct me if I'm misquoting.
Click to expand...

They recommend not using TMax RS developer in rotary processing, but then again, it's just a recommendation. I still use it on occasion with no problems.

Edit: This is incorrect, TMax developer is for the processing of roll films in rotary or "traditional" agitation methods, but not recommended to be used with sheet films in any way. TMax RS can be used for the above plus sheet films and/or replenishment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JLP

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,608
Location
Oregon
Format
Multi Format
Jeremy, Daniel is right, T-Max developer is not recomended for sheet film as well as rotary processing. T-Max RS is recomended for sheet film and rotary processing.
 

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
2,761
Location
Denton, TX
Format
Multi Format
JLP said:
Jeremy, Daniel is right, T-Max developer is not recomended for sheet film as well as rotary processing. T-Max RS is recomended for sheet film and rotary processing.
Click to expand...

Okay, we've both got it wrong. I just checked Kodak's technical .pdf for TMax developer on their website: http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/j86/j86.pdf

And Tmax Developer is only for roll films, but can be used for rotary processing--no sheet film period.

Tmax RS can be used to do everything the Tmax can plus sheet films and replenishment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…