Theo Sulphate
Member
Normally I dislike using wide angle lenses, but the SWC is special. To my surprise, in the last 20 years I've probably used my SWC more than all my Hasselblad bodies and lenses combined.
There must be something wrong with me I don't own any of them.
What I find sad is this article, now five years old, showcases in it's opening paragraph four separate film cameras that you could buy new back when this was written, that you cannot now. Holy run on sentence batman.
No, it just means you don't have GAS. With an F-1N, you likely don't need those cameras anyway. You probably use your money for something crazy instead - like making pictures!
Eh? That PC Mag article was written in 2013. None of those cameras, except for maybe the SWC and the last Rolleiflex could be bought new in 2013. Perhaps I'm mistaken?
Well, I bought my Voigtlander Bessa r3m new from downtown photo in Toronto in 2016 just as Voigtlander was phasing them out. ... also fuji was still selling their 120 film folding camera ...
You need to read the second paragraph. It talks about the cameras that I mentioned. The rest of the article is the list of 10 cameras. Take another peak.Something's not right. The link in the original post,
https://www.pcmag.com/feature/309360/10-cool-classic-film-cameras
has these 10 cameras,
1. Hasselblad SWC
2. Rolleiflex TLR
3. Leica M6
4. Canon AE-1
5. Nikon F3
6. Olympus XA
7. Pentax LX
8. Pentax 67
9. Rollei 35
A. Ricoh GR-1
The opening paragraph mentions no cameras, though later it mentions Diana F+ and Horizon Kompakt
You need to read the second paragraph. It talks about the cameras that I mentioned. The rest of the article is the list of 10 cameras. Take another peak.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |