HerSmokeySun
Member
Hello everybody! I've been a long-time lurker mooching off the wealth of info here without making an account, however a question has come up that I haven't been able to find a definitive answer to.
In short, I recently upgraded from my '51 Automat MX Rolleiflex to a '56 2.8E with a Xenotar Lens after almost a year of saving my pennies. This camera (the 2.8) came with some accessories, including a Panoramic Head attachment. It is the older style with the support pegs in the front next to the level.
So, my question is:
Does the old-style pano-head attachments provide the same protection that the Rolleifix does?
I still have the Rolleifix from my Automat that is compatible with my 2.8E, however I'm curious if I could use the pano-head in place of the Rolleifix when it comes to protection from bending the back of the camera when mounted to a tripod. The quick disconnect feature is nice, but not something that I use incredibly often when I mount my Rollei to a tripod, I'm simply looking to ensure that I won't damage my cameras.
Thank you in advance for your advice.
In short, I recently upgraded from my '51 Automat MX Rolleiflex to a '56 2.8E with a Xenotar Lens after almost a year of saving my pennies. This camera (the 2.8) came with some accessories, including a Panoramic Head attachment. It is the older style with the support pegs in the front next to the level.
So, my question is:
Does the old-style pano-head attachments provide the same protection that the Rolleifix does?
I still have the Rolleifix from my Automat that is compatible with my 2.8E, however I'm curious if I could use the pano-head in place of the Rolleifix when it comes to protection from bending the back of the camera when mounted to a tripod. The quick disconnect feature is nice, but not something that I use incredibly often when I mount my Rollei to a tripod, I'm simply looking to ensure that I won't damage my cameras.
Thank you in advance for your advice.