• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

is photography supposed to be reality ?

is a photograph supposed to be reality ?

  • yes

    Votes: 16 18.8%
  • no

    Votes: 69 81.2%

  • Total voters
    85
  • This poll will close: .

Well, I didn't say "taking a photo of a house" -- I just said a photo of a house. "Taking a photo" is a different thing altogether -- it's obviously an activity, someone is doing it somehow, its aspect is vague, and the result (photo) may not be anything recognizable from the activity that generated it (at least not by an audience and possibly not by the photographer). But the end result is the end result - unless you change it, then there's a subsequent end result. Things can always change.

As for people confusing the content of a photo (content can be flushed out in a thousand different ways) and the supposed reality behind it - often the photographic content is the only available reality. That is the power of documentary photography: its ability to generate the reality of a situation for an audience. It's also the reason people sometimes don't trust documentary photography.

At the very least, even straightforward art photography is representative of something - but it's usually "reality, as seen by" - not retouched but discriminated.
 
No,if you want reality look out of the window or tke a bus.
 
Thank goodness the poll will finally settle this pressing question once and for all, and in less than 25 years.
 
  • ChristopherCoy
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Please don't reply to spam. Just report it.
  • warden
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Please don't reply to spam. Just report it.
  • Alex Benjamin
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Please don't reply to spam. Just report it.