My first reaction to the OPs post was to say, limit the variables. In other words stick with one film and developer, master the times and temperature, get an enlarger with a flat field of illumination and use a good lens at an optimum aperture. Make sure your developer is at the right temperature and prints are properly washed.I guess you're suggesting that obstacles are helpful in finding and expressing ones vision, and I'm saying that an obstacle is an obstacle. If ones vision is strong enough nothing can stop it, but not everyone is an artistic genius and some of us just want a hobby. It's all good.
My advice would be keep looking. I paid £1 for a monochrome enlarger and about £60 for a pro colour enlarger. Chances are someone in the vicinity will have one if he puts the word out and is prepared to wait. Meanwhile if he has a d*g*t*l camera he can "scan" the negatives. Not ideal but better than now't. There must surely be facsimiles of 1950s "Make Your Own Enlarger" articles somewhere on the internet?Some very interesting thoughts and comments on my original post. The young man HAD investigated purchasing a used enlarger. He had found one for 20 Euros, but the shipping was going to be 70 Euros.
If film photography is to survive (stop the hemorrhage of disappearing manufacturers, photo stores, etc.), I believe that we collectively must encourage any and all who show any amount of interest to explore this endeavor. If we are honest with ourselves, I believe that somewhere along the way someone encouraged each of us. It might have been something as simple as someone giving you an old camera they no longer wanted, or a neighbor who let you watch them develop a print, or any number of other ways. Nonetheless, all were encouragement, no matter how subtle.
I've found that a large number of photographers are rather blind to the idea that people like playing with mechanical things. Many are obviously very baffled by the idea that someone somewhere might want to actually build something, or design things, or to create something new or different from what others are currently using, and that people can take great pleasure of that in and of itself with zero relation to the passion that is photography.
"Why would you want to do that when you could be taking photos?!"
It can be maddening to try and talk about design details with photographers at times, because many seem to feel that camera designs are somehow holy relics or something. Cameras and related gear are apparently things that are prefect, and to talk about changes to them is somehow blasphemy of some sort.
I've tried to start conversations about various topics, but had them grind to a halt with "Someone else has already made the tools, why on earth would you want to make more?!", which I find rather ironic, given the kind of response you might get if you asked why anyone would want to take photos when you could just order prints of existing ones online for far less.
As with almost all threads on APUG they usually evolve or devolve into the same thread only expressed or argued in a different manner. Although that can be fun too.
And to continue in that vein I will reiterate that because we ourselves have a mindset or a goal for our photography we still have to remember that other people come at things from an entirely different mindset. Many on this site consider photography a hobby and many more are probably retired and this is their new chosen way to spend their last days. (ha ha). Others are serious amateurs and some are professionals. And we all have different goals and uses for our photography.
So when one persons goal is to make commercially salable work for their niche in this field, other people goals are to enjoy the time consuming process of the process of photography. Since their prints have no commercial value to them, selling them is not even a consideration. To them its about the enjoyment or masochism of going through the processes and steps of traditional photography and print making. Other people are far more interested in streamlining the processes and concentrating on getting the best print possible and spending their time on the end results. And there are all the people in between.
So while some would prefer the journey, so to speak, which to them is the journey to get to the print, others perhaps are more concerned with the journey to be more salable and to advance in that direction, and doing tedious darkroom steps actually can actually slow down their journey.
So when we ask questions, or debate or argue with other people here, we have to realize that in most cases our goals are entirely different.
Some people garden to enjoy gardening and others garden to get fresh food for their table or to sell. All these people are gardeners but for different reasons.
This post should be a sticky somewhere. Top of the APUG main page would be a good spot.
OK. I am one of those persons who recommended he just go out and pick up a pre-built enlarger. And I am a tinkerer, who has built some enlargers
from scratch, albeit rather fancy ones. The point is not to discourage anyone; but frankly, what he hand in mind looked like something that would burn
a house down. You don't want to lead someone down that kind of path.
People tend to not learn a great deal when the answers they get to questions they ask basically boil down to "You are too stupid to do anything on your own, have someone else do it for you.".
People tend to not learn a great deal when the answers they get to questions they ask basically boil down to "You are too stupid to do anything on your own, have someone else do it for you."
I don't think I'm going to tell someone how to make their own stop bath from straight glacial acetic acid if they've never had a basic chemistry class in school. That kind of thing is not doing anyone a favor.
Yeah, yeah, Ken.... Take it all for granted. I've seen peoples faces almost burned off.
The basement of my own high school chemistry class was blown up.
I know a phD (not in chemistry) who ruined his lungs for life with mere 18% muriatic acid.
Don't assume everyone took 101 chemistry.
Every pool cleaner knows that muriatic is dilute hydrocholic, but then they also know it has to be re-diluted dramatically before the kids swim in it. Or do you think that when you pop a can of Coca Cola it's the same thing as when they pump tank cars of carbonic acid?
What did the high school science teacher tell you about dumping concentrated acid into standing water? No. NOT everyone by a long shot knows this.
So Ken, you've never seen or heard of acid burn? It doesn't need to be ignited.
Don't try to correct me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?