Where's that Vanbar guy that responds to questions like this?
That's me! I Only check in periodically, and I must apologise as I haven't read the whole thread.
The long and short of it is this :
The retailers aren't making huge margains on film / chem. We don't buy Velvia for $5 and sell it for $27.
The Australian distributors sell the goods to retailers at prices which they set, or have handed down by whomever.
If the cost to the local distributors was less then the retail price would come down.
Currently, as someone else put it, big photographic companies only like certain parts of what we call 'Free Market Economics'. This means that since Australia is a small market we effectively pay more.
Do I agree? No.
Do local retailers have the ability to change the situation? No.
The real shame of this whole situation is the 'vicious-cycle' aspect.
Customers stop buying as much film-stock via Australian channel.
Australian channel sees reduced demand, increases price / stops keeping that line.
The issue here is, the Australian distributor isn't seeing the whole picture. They aren't aware of the demand for their product as customers are purchasing via a different channel.
The other channel (US/HK) sees steady demand and prices remain in check.
This is all my personal opinion, and shouldn't be confused with an official 'statement' or other formal message.