Is Ilfosol S supposed to be brown?

Waldsterben

D
Waldsterben

  • 1
  • 0
  • 565
Microbus

H
Microbus

  • 3
  • 1
  • 2K
Release the Bats

A
Release the Bats

  • 15
  • 0
  • 2K
Sonatas XII-47 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-47 (Life)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,670
Messages
2,795,198
Members
99,997
Latest member
que
Recent bookmarks
0

Derek Lofgreen

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2006
Messages
901
Location
Minnesota
Format
Multi Format
I went to the camera shop to buy some new developer (yes the store actually carries wet darkroom gear). I got it home and over the weekend was going to soup some negs. I opened a brand new bottle of Ilfosol S and it was brown, like tea or weak coffee color. Is it supposed to be brown when it's new or is it bad?

So far all the liquid dev I've used has been clear and then turn brown over time as they oxidize. I haven't used this particular kind so I'm just checking before I soup my negs.

D.
 

Akki14

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
London, UK
Format
4x5 Format
I thought the bottle said it should be yellow and it's quite a bright yellow if i remember correctly. I'd go with the develop a bit of leader suggestion to make sure it's not off.
 

Lee J

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
55
Format
Multi Format
Yes Ilfosol S is brown, unlike most other (?) Ilford film developers.
 

steven_e007

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Messages
826
Location
Shropshire,
Format
Multi Format
I've just bought a fresh bottle of Ilfosol S a few days ago. I haven't opened it yet.

Hang on a minute, I'll just nip up the loft and fetch it...








...ok. I'm back.

Well, it was just like very weak tea. A pale yellowy brown.

HTH :smile:

Steve
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Messages
2,034
Location
Cheshire UK
Format
Medium Format
Dear All,

ILFOSOL S when opened should be the colour of weak tea, more yellow than brown.

Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :
 

mkiernan

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2005
Messages
80
Location
NSW, Austral
Format
35mm
I used to use Ilfosol-S all the time (as it was the developer my Camera Shop carried). Although most bottles were fine, a couple were very bad, resulting in very thin negatives. I quickly learned that brown is bad, yellowish brown is OK. Relative to other developers Ilfosol is cheap, so I persevered for quite awhile, just throwing away bottles when they turned out brown. I have subsequently changes to HC110 because it is consistently OK, just like my preciously guarded stock of Rodinol (which is brown anyway). Ilfosol seems to be less reliable than other developers (at least the ones mentioned here), but it is value for money, and you can tell when it is off. I think your bottle is off.

Michael K
 

dphill

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2005
Messages
108
Location
Brownsville, OR
Format
35mm
But Ilfosol 3 is supposed to fix that problem, right Simon?

Dan
 
OP
OP
Derek Lofgreen

Derek Lofgreen

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2006
Messages
901
Location
Minnesota
Format
Multi Format
Thanks guys. I was testing a very old folder and souped the negs with the dev and they are pretty thin. I don't know if it's the developer or the camera. I have another roll from a tired and true camera i will try with the developer. The developer does look like tea to me, glad to know it's supposed too.

D.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,101
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Thanks guys. I was testing a very old folder and souped the negs with the dev and they are pretty thin. I don't know if it's the developer or the camera. I have another roll from a tired and true camera i will try with the developer. The developer does look like tea to me, glad to know it's supposed too.

D.


There was an article on Ilfosol and thin negs a couple of weeks ago in the U.K. magazine "Amateur Photographer". I cannot recall the film in question but the conclusion was that the Ilford dev times might be too short.

I posted a thread on 35mm D400 and Ilfosol. The Ilford times were 9 mins for 35mm but 10 for 120. Based on the article I decided on 10.5 mins for my 35mm D400. The negs were OK but I think that 11 mins might be even better.

So while 120 film in D400 is a minute longer, it could be that even 120 would benefit from longer dev.

Now for some speculation based on the above: The Ilford times might be a little short across a range of films. Certainly if 10.5 mins was about OK then 9 mins at 1.5 mins shorter is likely to produce thin negs.

pentaxuser
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
So when will Ilfosil 3 be available in the Americas and will there be a change in development times.

Bill
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
That's great news Simon, even if I have a cupboard full of Ilfotec-HC! :D
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
Can't wait to try Ilfosil 3 out Simon. Let us know when its ready.

Bill
 

sienarot

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
78
Location
Calgary, Alb
Format
Medium Format
The first time I used Ilfosol S, it was a very bright yellow (I don't know if I'd describe it as yellowy-brown). Before I found out about "sudden developer death syndrome" that Ilfosol is known to have, I used some that had been sitting around for many months only to find out it had expired. It was a very rusty brown colour at this time.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom