Is exposure index and ISO actually relevant

redbandit

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2022
Messages
440
Location
USA
Format
35mm
in the realm of photographic work anymore?

Sure, you can choose to expose a film at box speed, or at your own preferend iso for the light meter to play with. You just have to learn how to develop it right...

Problem that pops up, is that with film, change the developer, change the agitation pattern, change the time you dump the developer out... You create things that change how the developed negative comes out to you.

SO if say using rodinal and foma 400, "barney" claims you can only get good shots using EI 320 setting and 1+50, but mike shoots box speed and uses 1+100, and so forth... why does one even CARE what the light meter or even the iso being shot at?

To further the point... I leave my nikon digital on auto ISO.... when i get bored i toss it to auto modes and take random exposures on things... I learned that using the EV scale i can change the shutter speed 2 or 3 times,,, and using the same aperture, i can drop the AE iso from 20,000 down to 800 with no trouble...
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,708
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Of course it's relevant. In film photography, if you want to somewhat accurately control exposure, you still have to know what to set the meter to.

For people who don't care how the negatives turn out or who are unaware of the basics of metering technique, of course it doesn't matter.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,935
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
redbandit, if you don't care then it is irrelevant to you but that presumably applies to everything you, I or the rest of humanity does

pentaxuser
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,789
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
It is basically irrelevant -- if you do your own tests -- but it gives you a place to start, no matter what film, developer, and paper you use. And once my tests are done, I know how to set my meter for each film.

But it is relevant -- and essential -- to those photographers (the VAST majority) who don't do their own tests.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
Film speed is one of the four basic variables in exposure. It is not only relevant, it is absolutely critical.


wait...are you asking is the ISO film speed, printed on the box relevant? It is but some only take it as a hint, a starting point for exposure index. Others use it as exposure index. Either way, film speed is certainly relevant.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,286
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format

That you think this relates to film exposure suggests to me that you lack understanding of exposure/what ISO/EI is. Do some reading?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,444
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
I think what he's saying is that you can vary the ISO setting on film a little (from box speed) and a whole lot on digital and the cameras will still be able to provide a shot that's exposed OK. We're not limited to some preset selection of ISO. I don't think he's saying the triangle of exposure can be ignored.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,356
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Do not listen to barney or mike, they are so full of it their eye are brown and they know less than nothing. I am the only one anyone should listen to.
  • Get the your cameras and light meters calibrated
  • Put a protective filter on your lens
  • Meter without the sky in the field of view or on the subject without the sky or use an incident meter
  • Shoot box speed
  • Adjusting for shadows with the Zone System or experience when necessary
  • Adjust for filter compensations as necessary
 
OP
OP

redbandit

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2022
Messages
440
Location
USA
Format
35mm

The triangle so to speak is still important, but with the advant of things... the only portions of the triangle that matter seem to be shutter speed and aperture.

Look at Foma 400 in 134.. box says 400, everybody else says it has to be shot at 320 or less to get reliable images.. Thing is,,, the film does make images at box speed, and depending on the actual PROCESSING done... developer, length of development, agitation pattern when developing it... the results completely negate the actual "specified" EI everyone uses..

Even with other films.. the classic "develop the film 20 percent longer if you were shooting in bright light.." makes a preset ISO / EI as irrelevant.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
Speed + Light = Aperture + Time

Just because you let the computer choose one or two or, in the case of digital, all three of the free variables doesn't make any of them irrelevant.
 
Last edited:

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,439
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
Exposure Index is still relevant. How I used it 30 years ago when shooting weddings...I took ISO 160 color negative film, used Exposure Index 100 to expose it, then sent it to a commercial lab for standard processing. By increasing exposure +0.66EV, I was more sure that the shadow areas did not come out 'muddy' looking in the shot; the well-lit areas could easily deal with the added exposure with zero visible affect on the photo quality. Those principles are still valid today, too.

In thge digital world, one might say that the practice of ETTR (Expose to the Right of the histogram) is merely utilizing an Exposure Index higher than the factory calibrated ISO, to move the sensor response toward the right side of the histogram.
 
Last edited:

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
652
Format
35mm
I am not quite sure what the OP is saying, but I will respond to this part:

"SO if say using rodinal and foma 400, "barney" claims you can only get good shots using EI 320 setting and 1+50, but mike shoots box speed and uses 1+100, and so forth... why does one even CARE what the light meter or even the iso being shot at?"

I don't see how if people shoot at different EI's why they would have less need to meter to get the proper exposure. The comparison to auto ISO mode with digital doesn't fit with analog. The camera lacks the ability to change the characteristics of the film automatically. The photographer must manually make adjustments for different ISO's with processing time etc. But even then there is little photographers can do to change the inherent sensitivity of a film. One can compensate for underexposure with increased development, but the film is still underexposed. You used to hear that you could shoot a roll of film with all different ISO's and throw it in a two-bath developer, and it would come out fine. But that's an exaggeration.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,286
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I feel the opposite is the case - many film beginners and youtubers these days seem to treat EI as another variable along with shutter speed and aperture, which it isn't, or at least seem to vastly overestimate the usefulness of varying it. Maybe that's a misunderstanding coming from digital cameras, people see they can adjust ISO on a film camera as well and think it does the same thing... maybe also the OP's misunderstanding. Of course EI can be varied if light dictates or tweaked a bit to suit other process variables, but sensitivity is baked into the emulsion and straying very far from the ideal exposure (especially towards underexposure, leeway for everexposure is often significant but nothing is gained by giving more exposure beyond a point) will only yield special effects negatives.
 
Last edited:

Steven Lee

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Messages
1,416
Location
USA
Format
Medium Format
The way I read the OP's question is that exposure index is useless when conveying information about exposure because by itself it's not universal. It depends on one's metering and development. In practice this means that if I take someone's advice of exposing HP5+ at 250 and "copy&paste" it into my workflow, I may end up with a result very different from the person's giving advice.

If that's the case I agree wholeheartedly. I always ignore EI comments for this reason.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,286
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format

I don't read this in the OP at all but if that is indeed meant, I also agree.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,935
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Maybe redbandit will help us by saying which of our posts with their respective explanations get closest to what he meant, otherwise we end up discussing what we think he meant

pentaxuser
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,789
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
This is what was said, and it's absolutely correct:

"you can choose to expose a film at box speed, or at your own preferend iso for the light meter to play with. You just have to learn how to develop it right..."
 

FotoD

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Messages
390
Location
EU
Format
Analog
ISO/EI is perhaps irrelevant. What matters is how many photons hit the film. Each film has a minimum number to start building density.

But it's usually easier to work with ISO/EI than counting photons.
 

FotoD

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2020
Messages
390
Location
EU
Format
Analog
Hold on, I'm supposed to pour developer on the photons?
 

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
652
Format
35mm

Okay, I was confused about how the digital autoexposure thing relates to this.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,544
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
With B&W negative, the easy rule of thumb is "the more you enlarge, the less latitude"
Contact prints from B&W negatives have the greatest latitude, but mostly for over-exposure.

 
Last edited:

Saganich

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
1,271
Location
Brooklyn
Format
35mm RF
Regarding b&w film, the iso works to help manage information in zones 1-3, whereas the other variables mentioned are generally used to mange Zones 7-9. For example I'm working with Kodak double X trying to get a routine ISO and development time. It's rated at 200, but I'll shoot it 400 and get almost no information in Zone 1 and 2. The point is that's not going to change with development time, agitation, or the usual chemistry...I'll get the same density down there at 4 min or 10 min dev time in standard solvent developer like D76. So, if I want more information in zone 1 and 2 I'll have to rate the film at 200 or less. It depends on what you want, higher contrast look with less tonal values, or less contrast look with expanded tonal values. Auto exposure is kinda the foil of this, metering everything to middle grey. When I first started taking pictures I had a manual Nikon and then was gifted a 'fancy' minolta with auto everything. It took me 10 years to recover for the horrors of auto exposure in B&W.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…