Is Deadpan Dead?

The Gap

H
The Gap

  • 1
  • 2
  • 22
Ithaki Steps

H
Ithaki Steps

  • 2
  • 0
  • 57
Pitt River Bridge

D
Pitt River Bridge

  • 3
  • 0
  • 62

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,999
Messages
2,784,379
Members
99,764
Latest member
BiglerRaw
Recent bookmarks
0

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
I'd say that only some of those are really "deadpan". I'm not terribly fond of the series - I don't like the photographer's lighting style. On a separate but not entirely unrelated note, flipping through that gallery on Flickr was particularly jarring because of the ads inserted every five or six images, because the ads were so stylistically different from the photos in the series.

i didn't scroll through every image, didn't find anything jarring or the ads obtrusive, and i liked what i saw.
it was nice to see straight forward portraits, some expressionless + deaapan some not
in color without some sort of veil of attempting to claim they are the reincarnation of dead photographer's /schtick,
or hope some 19th century style / process might make terrible photographs OK because of some "process"
they are just unassuming portraits ... which is nice
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,971
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
It was only in the 1920's that smiling for one's picture became fashionable.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
i didn't scroll through every image, didn't find anything jarring or the ads obtrusive, and i liked what i saw.
it was nice to see straight forward portraits, some expressionless + deaapan some not
in color without some sort of veil of attempting to claim they are the reincarnation of dead photographer's /schtick,
or hope some 19th century style / process might make terrible photographs OK because of some "process"
they are just unassuming portraits ... which is nice

What was "Jarring" for me was the contrast of the slickness of the ads in contrast to the "rawness" of the images.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,542
Format
35mm RF

Curt

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
I heard that Karsh often talked with his subjects while setting up and got the photo he wanted, without them knowing he was hitting the shutter. It must have taken great patience and dedication to get those expressions.

I read that his portrait of Winston Churchill was the result of taking the picture while taking the cigar out of his mouth.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I read that his portrait of Winston Churchill was the result of taking the picture while taking the cigar out of his mouth.

The picture was taken after, and he had only a split second to grab that shot, all the more challenging given he was shooting an 8x10. I heard that Churchill forgave him for it when he realized why Karsh was doing it, and that he got an iconic image as a result. But he had Churchill for all of five minutes or so between the two chambers of the houses of Parliament in Ottawa as he was going from one house to the other to speak.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,097
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The picture was taken after, and he had only a split second to grab that shot, all the more challenging given he was shooting an 8x10. I heard that Churchill forgave him for it when he realized why Karsh was doing it, and that he got an iconic image as a result. But he had Churchill for all of five minutes or so between the two chambers of the houses of Parliament in Ottawa as he was going from one house to the other to speak.

He actually shot two - the other one has Churchill smiling.

Karsh did a wonderful job describing how everything happened when I saw him speak in the 1970s.

Somewhere I have a grainy, blurred 35mm negative with Karsh winking at me as I took his photograph at that speaking engagement - I had no flash, and there was just no light!
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
He actually shot two - the other one has Churchill smiling.

Karsh did a wonderful job describing how everything happened when I saw him speak in the 1970s.

Somewhere I have a grainy, blurred 35mm negative with Karsh winking at me as I took his photograph at that speaking engagement - I had no flash, and there was just no light!

matt

in the book portraits of greatness
he writes about the whole process.
i would have loved to have seen him speak
hmmm lou reed and karsh! YOW!
unfortunately i only heard his assistant on the phone :wink:
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom