removed account4
Subscriber
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
I'd say that only some of those are really "deadpan". I'm not terribly fond of the series - I don't like the photographer's lighting style. On a separate but not entirely unrelated note, flipping through that gallery on Flickr was particularly jarring because of the ads inserted every five or six images, because the ads were so stylistically different from the photos in the series.
i didn't scroll through every image, didn't find anything jarring or the ads obtrusive, and i liked what i saw.
it was nice to see straight forward portraits, some expressionless + deaapan some not
in color without some sort of veil of attempting to claim they are the reincarnation of dead photographer's /schtick,
or hope some 19th century style / process might make terrible photographs OK because of some "process"
they are just unassuming portraits ... which is nice