firemachine69
Member
So I've got this weird issue. My first foray into 35mm film photography (well, on my own, not my parent's camera) was a Nikon F75. As long as I'm doing my part and the shutter speed is acceptable, I get tack-sharp images with virtually any lens I own.
Not so much with my recently picked-up F100. I swear, it seems like the focus is nearly not as sharp, even with the same lenses. I've been meaning to get the film scanned as hi-res tiffs to make sure (as I'm using a local shop that still hand-processes film, but will only scan to jpegs under 5MB), but even with low-res scans, my F75 has always given me very satisfying pictures.
Even with my 50mm F/1.8G, I find most of the photos are just "meh".
I picked up my F100 on Ebay, and I'm in my final days of Ebay's money back guarantee / leaving negative feedback.
First picture is the F75, second is the F100: I know, different films and lighting conditions, but the overall difference in sharpness is consistent across all film and light.
Not so much with my recently picked-up F100. I swear, it seems like the focus is nearly not as sharp, even with the same lenses. I've been meaning to get the film scanned as hi-res tiffs to make sure (as I'm using a local shop that still hand-processes film, but will only scan to jpegs under 5MB), but even with low-res scans, my F75 has always given me very satisfying pictures.
Even with my 50mm F/1.8G, I find most of the photos are just "meh".
I picked up my F100 on Ebay, and I'm in my final days of Ebay's money back guarantee / leaving negative feedback.
First picture is the F75, second is the F100: I know, different films and lighting conditions, but the overall difference in sharpness is consistent across all film and light.