mikewhi said:So, it ws you! I wondered who snapped that set up. I hope it works out. Please post when you've tried them out and let us know, ok? View Camera Magazine had a review of them a few years back. You might go to ther site and check their article archive. If you can find the issue it was in, I'll look it up and send you a copy of the review if I can find it.
mikewhi said:I did find that in the View Camera index on their web-site they did review the lens in the Jan/Feb 1998 issue, pages 48-53. I found the issue in my collection. I will photo-copy the article and mail it to you if you send me you mailing address. My e-mail is firstname.lastname@example.org.
darinwc said:"what do you mean when you say that sharpness is the least important factor? If I'm going to enlarge, isn't sharpness and resolution important?"
-I mean that im not going to quibble over small differences in sharpness. I am not going to take a microscope to a negative. Considering a 16x20 print from a 4x5 negative is only a 4x enlargement, a small difference in sharpness is not very important.
|Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. |
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: