• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

IR film: any users of it in sheet film size?

Curt

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
Can you enlighten me on the results of IR sheet film, Freestyle has it and I've not used it in sheets and only very limited in roll film sizes decades ago?

With or without a filter, which red and what effect, what developer, your experiences etc.?

Thanks,
Curt
 

Usagi

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Turku, Finla
Format
Multi Format
i use efke ir820 sheet film occasionally. 4x5 size.

The red filter is not enough for this film. With 720 ir filter the result is nice.

I expose with exposure index 1.5 when the filter is on. Sometimes iso 3 is also enough.

For develop i use d-23 as two bath.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
13,032
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
The IR films out there are crap compared to the long gone Kodak stuff. I've tried them all. I've stuck with Efke's, but it's a love hate relationship. If you want classic IR effect, you have to shoot with an opaque IR filter (kodak 87), rate the film at EI 1.5, and get used to exposures at f/11 on a sunny day to run up and beyond 22 seconds (with reciprocity factored in). I get best results in xtol 1+1, developed for 14:00, in BTZS tubes. Rollie's isn't any better, but the grain is. Hate that micro thin film base though!! SOMEONE PLEASE BRING BACK KODAK'S IR FILM!!! Come on China!
 

2F/2F

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
I think that both b/w IR films available today are great. Each has a different look. Efke is grungy, has a wonky curve, and has a more intense IR effect. Rollei is very clean and modern looking and has a milder IR effect; it also works very well as a standard film, even without the IR filtration. I like either of them better than Kodak's for most things, and they are available in a larger array of formats. It's all a matter of opinion, as you see.

The big advantage of the Kodak was that you could get decent IR effects hand with a 25A or 29 filter held without a focus adjustment.

I would like to figure out how to do the required defocusing to get things sharp when using a large format camera.

I have never used a 22 second exposure on a clear and sunny day. On overcast days, yes; it needs a ton of exposure then. But in the sun at f/11, I would usually shoot a bracketed sequence at 2 sec, 1 sec., and 1/2 sec.
 

rawhead

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
588
Location
Boston, MA
Format
Medium Format
There's a formula for the amount of focus shift required depending on the focal length of the lens. Basically add .25% of focal length to the bellows extension (or Focal Length ÷ 400). I've also seen 1/200 (or 0.5%) mentioned elsewhere.... I'll have to do some tests :LOL:
 

Usagi

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Turku, Finla
Format
Multi Format
OP
OP

Curt

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
Thanks all, nice photos and excellent feedback.

Curt
 

hirokun

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Messages
20
Location
Tokyo
Format
4x5 Format
In 4x5 I only use Rollei IR 400 and Efke IR 820. I'd say Efke has more of a typical, dreamy IR look, bu lacks some sharpness/crispness. Mainly because of its dreamy/glowing look. Sometimes it can come in handy, sometimes I prefer a more accurate look, which the Rollei IR 400 provides. Still IR, but much sharper, less grain.

As a filter I use a Heliopan RG 715 (715nm). In medium format I use a 700nm filter made by Rollei.

Exposurewise, when using the 715nm filter, I set my light meter to 1-3 ASA for the Efke and to somewhere between 3-12 ASA for the Rollei. As always with IR, I do some "bracketing". I usually estimate the correct exposure (light meter + experience + some guessing) and then take another shot overexposed by one stop.

I process film at home. Recently, I got hooked to black & white slides, so I now mostly do b&w reversal processing. It's the same process, no matter what film it is.

Here's an example of a recent IR shot in 4x5 on Efke IR 820 with a 715nm filter.

 

herb

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
405
Format
Medium Format
IR film

I use Rollei IR in 120 and 4x5 without a filter and with red 29 and 25. My main use however is with a 720 nm filter. It has a decent speed of 6 with that filter, developed in replenished xtol stock for 8 min. Much finer grain than Efke, which as has been said, has unpredictable quality. Their regular b/w film has the same problems. Saving money on film is poor economics.