Intrepid 8x10 Camera, Plus Agfa Ansco 8x10 6x6 Lens Board to Sinar 140mm Board

Im debating to get back into shooting 8x10. I used to own a Agfa Ansco 8x10 Commercial camera, but sold it due to its weight. The Intrepid is a lot lighter, which makes me consider using it. I'd probably use a Fuji L 300mm F6.3 on it. Anyone use the new current (as of 2025) Intrepid 8x10 cameras, and are you happy with it? I know they are flimsy compared to old cameras, but I dont want the weight this time. Intrepid only weighs 6 pounds. And its very compact, which most 8x10 cameras are not. I might also get a 8x10 to 5x7 reducing back for the Intrepid, since they sell that.

I still have my old Ansco lens board, which is a 6x6 board. Its made out of thicker wood. Could that board be cut down to 140mm easily? Will the thickness of my board be an issue on the Intrepid? I have a Fuji 180mm which barely covers 8x10 I'd like to reuse, but need the lensboard to work on the Intepid.

Also anyone ever use the Kodak Ektar 12" f4.5 lens? Its expensive in comparison to the Fuji's I use, but wondering if its worth a look? Am I correct that the 12" is basically 305mm?

As with most things, it generally comes down to your budget. If you want precision and lightweight, I'd look at the Chamonix Alpanist or the new Summit. I have the v1 and v2 Intrepid 8x10's and either gets the job done, but they're no match for my Deardorff. I toss the Intrepid in the backpack when I'm planning a long hike. I was thinking about upgrading to the latest 8x10 because it would be nice to have the bail back for easier inserting/removing of a film holder. However, I'm concerned about the pivot point of mechanism which has metal rubbing against bare plywood. Seems to me that over time this might become an issue. I emailed Intrepid about it and they assured me that it probably wouldn't be an issue. Hmm...doesn't quite compute for me.

If you Fuji 180mm has inside lettering it will just barely cover 8x10; outside lettering no. I don't know what the exact translation from inches to millimeters is, but I've always thought of a 12" lens as 300mm (could be 305mm...close enough.)

I bought the latest Intrepid 8x10 all-black version last year, and since upgrade with the bail back. Before that, I have a Deardorff V8 8x10. I have not done a ton of film yet on either, but here is my personal experience.

1) The Intrepid is very functional and ideal for light hiking. Often I just sling it in a Tenba messenger bag, grab a medium weight CF tripod and go. The saving in weight of the camera also translate to much lighter tripod/head combo. Therefore the total weight saving is significant.

2) I don't think the Intrepid 8x10 will survive more than 5 years of moderate-heavy use. Mine is the all-black version which has a lot of 3D printed parts. The weakest links are: the concentric knobs to control front rise and swing, the two little clips to secure the back in addition to the magnets. If you are a gentle user and can do a bit of self-service and replacement of parts occasionally, then you will be ok.

3) Lenses: I'm using lightweight lenses, especially G-Claron 305/9 which is just about perfect both in terms of size and weight for the Intrepid. Occasionally I use Fujinon 250/6.7 inner lettering for wider angle, but the movements are not as generous as the G-Claron. If you can swing it, do get a G-Claron 305/9!

4) Lens board: Intrepid 8x10 uses Sinar boards, which are thinner than typically wooden cameras (Deardorff V8, Kodak 2D). I believe it is better to mount your existing lenses on a Sinar board: they are reasonably priced. Sometimes I have to file or sand off a bit, since the Intrepid front is a bit tight. Nowadays I mostly 3D print lens boards myself.

So in summary, Intrepid 8x10 goes to places where my Deardorff V8 won't go easily. It has adequate quality for its price, but won't last like the older beasts (Ansco, Deardorff V8, Kodak 2D) etc. Just very different design/build for different purposes.

I think @blee1996 provided a very thoughtful summary of the key points regarding the Intrepid vs other cameras. I didn't talk about lenses... I have the 305/9 G-Claron which I'm sure would be useable on the Intrepid, but my preferred lenses for this camera are the Fuji A and C series; specifically, I use a 240A, 360A, and 450C. Though I've heard of other photographers using Copal 3 size lenses on the Intrepid, I wouldn't personally put my Schneider 360/6.8 or Fuji 360/6.5 CM-W on this camera.

Oh, and I forgot to mention that you should be handy with tools and be prepared for some DIY stuff. I've had knobs and bits-n-pieces fall off my Intrepid. The newest versions may be better in this regard, but as mentioned above it's "quality for its price."

I'll stick with what I said to you earlier, stick with the Fujinon with it's modern glass, and smaller shutter. I have the older Fujinon 180 that covers 8x10. If your's has the writing on the inside front face of the lens, then it'll cover... but just. There is no room for movements, unless you do closeup work.
Just remember with the Intrepid. You get what you pay for...and I'll leave it at that.

braxus said:

I still have my old Ansco lens board, which is a 6x6 board. Its made out of thicker wood. Could that board be cut down to 140mm easily? Will the thickness of my board be an issue on the Intrepid? I have a Fuji 180mm which barely covers 8x10 I'd like to reuse, but need the lensboard to work on the Intepid.

Also anyone ever use the Kodak Ektar 12" f4.5 lens? Its expensive in comparison to the Fuji's I use, but wondering if its worth a look? Am I correct that the 12" is basically 305mm?

Click to expand...

I use an Agfa Ansco Commercial View, as well as 2 Universal View cameras, all 10x8. It would be much easier to make a new wooden lens board, rather than cut down your Agfa Ansco lens board. I'm speaking from experience, as I make lens boards quite frequently, as well a lens board adapters.

If you want to use a lens like your 180mm on more than one camera then an adapter is the way to go. I made one to use lenses on Linhof/Wista lens boards on my Commercial view.

My Commercial View came with a 12" f6.8 Am Opt Dagor, I already owned a300mm f9 Nikkor M. Last year I bought a mint 1963 300mm f4.5 Xenar, in a Compound 5. The Xenar is a dream to focus, the Dagor still relatively easy, the Nikkor M slightly less so.

The Compound shutters are more reliable than the Ilex used with the Ektars.

Ian

braxus said:

Also anyone ever use the Kodak Ektar 12" f4.5 lens? Its expensive in comparison to the Fuji's I use, but wondering if its worth a look? Am I correct that the 12" is basically 305mm?

Click to expand...

I use this lens and really like how it draws an image, especially for people. I can’t give you any comparisons unfortunately. Somehow it just looks “right” when I see my prints. I will never sell it for any reason. However, you may consider the following:

- It is big and heavy
- 77mm filters front, 72mm rear
- Minimum aperture is f32 when mounted in an Ilex #5
- The Ilex shutters can be finicky
- Top speed is only 1/50th, and only if you don’t mind that it might actually be 1/30th or so

For general purpose use, an f5.6 Tessar, etc. stopping down to f64 or smaller might be a better choice. The 12” f4.5 was probably meant for use as a fast 5x7 portrait lens, but it easily covers 8x10.

BTW, yes, 12” is 305mm. (Ok, 304.8, but whatever.)

Alan9940 said:

Though I've heard of other photographers using Copal 3 size lenses on the Intrepid, I wouldn't personally put my Schneider 360/6.8 or Fuji 360/6.5 CM-W on this camera.

Click to expand...

I (occasionally) use a Mk1 8x10 Intrepid with Copal 3 Schneider lenses, esp. 300/5.6. It's a wobbly affair. It kind of works, but won't withstand heavy use.

The camera is a reasonably effective wind vane, which can be convenient if you're into flying a kite or sailing.

I don't know what changes they've done to the design for the later versions. I hope they fixed the problem with the bellows easily impinging into the image area which severely limits movements. Basically, the camera pretty much only works with very minimal or no rise at all. Tilt & swing within reasonable limits is not much or an issue.

It sure is lightweight. I don't think anything comes close to the Intrepid in that regard.

koraks said:

I (occasionally) use a Mk1 8x10 Intrepid with Copal 3 Schneider lenses, esp. 300/5.6. It's a wobbly affair. It kind of works, but won't withstand heavy use.

The camera is a reasonably effective wind vane, which can be convenient if you're into flying a kite or sailing.

I don't know what changes they've done to the design for the later versions. I hope they fixed the problem with the bellows easily impinging into the image area which severely limits movements. Basically, the camera pretty much only works with very minimal or no rise at all. Tilt & swing within reasonable limits is not much or an issue.

It sure is lightweight. I don't think anything comes close to the Intrepid in that regard.

Click to expand...

One advantage of the Agfa Ansco Commercial View is its rigidity, I have used mine in relatively stormy weather, waiting for the short pauses in gusting wind.

Ian

koraks said:

I (occasionally) use a Mk1 8x10 Intrepid with Copal 3 Schneider lenses, esp. 300/5.6. It's a wobbly affair. It kind of works, but won't withstand heavy use.

The camera is a reasonably effective wind vane, which can be convenient if you're into flying a kite or sailing.

I don't know what changes they've done to the design for the later versions. I hope they fixed the problem with the bellows easily impinging into the image area which severely limits movements. Basically, the camera pretty much only works with very minimal or no rise at all. Tilt & swing within reasonable limits is not much or an issue.

It sure is lightweight. I don't think anything comes close to the Intrepid in that regard.

Click to expand...

Yeah, I've heard that the Schneider 300/5.6 is kinda doable, but that lens is a "small fry" compared to my 360/6.8!

They really improved the bellows on v2 cameras vs v1. I don't use a lot of camera movements in my work, so I've never had an issue with v1 or v2. That said, though, I use my Deardorff more and only use the Intrepid when I'm planning a long(er) walk.

Ian Grant said:

One advantage of the Agfa Ansco Commercial View is its rigidity, I have used mine in relatively stormy weather, waiting for the short pauses in gusting wind.

Ian

Click to expand...

Same with my Deardorff sitting atop a Ries A100 tripod.

Being large format is my least used film format, even getting the Intrepid, I dont see it getting a ton of use. I have a 4x5 Speed Graphic, which also rarely goes out. I might use the 8x10 more than the 4x5 due to negative size, but again it wont get a ton of use. So Im probably ok with the Intrepid. I just want light weight and compact.